Bumpus v. Nangalama, et al

Filing 32

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/6/2014 ORDERING 30 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are ADOPTED in full; Defendant Fields is DISMISSED from this action; This action shall proceed with defendants Nangalama, Dillan, Sahota, Cox, TEachow and Deem. (Waggoner, D)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PATRICK BUMPUS, 12 13 14 No. 2:12-cv-01102 GEB DAD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER A. NANGALAMA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On December 5, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 5, 2013, are adopted in full; and 28 2. Defendant Fields is dismissed from this action. This action shall now proceed with 1 1 defendants Nangalama, Dillan, Sahota, Cox, Teachow and Deem. 2 Dated: January 6, 2014 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?