Bumpus v. Nangalama, et al
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/6/2014 ORDERING 30 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are ADOPTED in full; Defendant Fields is DISMISSED from this action; This action shall proceed with defendants Nangalama, Dillan, Sahota, Cox, TEachow and Deem. (Waggoner, D)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PATRICK BUMPUS,
12
13
14
No. 2:12-cv-01102 GEB DAD P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
A. NANGALAMA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On December 5, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
1. The findings and recommendations filed December 5, 2013, are adopted in full; and
28
2. Defendant Fields is dismissed from this action. This action shall now proceed with
1
1
defendants Nangalama, Dillan, Sahota, Cox, Teachow and Deem.
2
Dated: January 6, 2014
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?