Bumpus v. Nangalama, et al
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 2/11/14 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 1/6/14 31 are ADOPTED in full; The MOTION to DISMISS filed on 7/19/14 20 on behalf of defendants Nangalama, Dillan, Sahota, Cox, Teachow and Deem is GRANTED in part as follows: Plaintiff's claims against all defendants sued in their official capacities are DISMISSED; Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment claim is DISMISSED; and This action shall proceed against defendants in their individual capacities solely as to Plaintiff's claim that he was provided constitutionally inadequate medical care in violation of his rights under the Eighth Amendment. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PATRICK BUMPUS,
12
13
14
No. 2:12-cv-01102 GEB DAD P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
A. NANGALAMA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On January 6, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
1. The findings and recommendations filed January 6, 2014, are adopted in full;
28
2. The motion to dismiss filed on July 19, 2014 (ECF No. 20) on behalf of defendants
1
1
Nangalama, Dillan, Sahota, Cox, Teachow and Deem is granted in part as follows:
2
3
4
a. Plaintiff's claims against all defendants sued in their official capacities are
dismissed;
b. Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment claim is dismissed; and
5
3. This action shall proceed against defendants in their individual capacities solely as to
6
plaintiff's claim that he was provided constitutionally inadequate medical care in violation of his
7
rights under the Eighth Amendment.
8
Dated: February 11, 2014
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?