Bumpus v. Nangalama, et al

Filing 5

ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/25/2012 ORDERING that this action be randomly assigned to a District Judge; and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

PATRICK BUMPUS,

11
12
13

Plaintiff,

No. 2:12-cv-01102-DAD P

vs.
A. NANGALAMA, et al.,

14

ORDER AND

Defendants.

15

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
/

16

By an order filed May 14, 2012, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis

17

affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fees within thirty days and was cautioned that his failure to

18

do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has

19

now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed an in forma

20

pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee.

21
22

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be randomly assigned to
a District Judge.

23
24
25
26

Also, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice.
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District
Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen
1

1

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

2

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

3

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

4

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.

5

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

6

DATED: June 25, 2012.

7
8
9
10

DAD:4
bum1102.fifp

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2