Bumpus v. Nangalama, et al
Filing
64
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 1/25/2018 ORDERING pursuant to the parties stipulation plaintiff's opposition to the motion for summary judgment is due on or before 1/26/2018; and defendants' reply is due on or before 2/2/2018.(Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PATRICK BUMPUS,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:12-cv-1102 GEB DB P
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
A. NANGALAMA, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with counsel in this civil rights action pursuant to
18
42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on plaintiff’s original complaint on an Eighth
19
Amendment medical indifference claim against defendants Dr. Nangalama, Dr. Dhillon, Dr.
20
Sahota, LVN Cox, LVN Teachow, and A. Deem. Pending before the court is the parties’ joint
21
stipulation to enlarge the time for the parties to brief defendants’ pending motion for summary
22
judgment. (ECF No. 63.) Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
23
1. Plaintiff’s Opposition is due on or before January 26, 2018; and
24
2. Defendants’ Reply is due on or before February 2, 2018.
25
Dated: January 25, 2018
26
27
28
/DLB7;
DB/Inbox/Routine/bump1102.msj stip
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?