Jones v. Virga

Filing 17

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/29/2013 ADOPTING 13 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 11 Motion to Dismiss. Respondents are DIRECTED to file a response to petitioner's habeas petition within 60 days from the date of this order. (Donati, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODNEY WAYNE JONES, Petitioner, 11 vs. 12 13 No. 2:12-cv-1138 LKK GGH HC TIM VIRGA , et. al., Respondents. 14 ORDER / 15 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of 16 17 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 15, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 19 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 15, 2012, are adopted in full; 2 2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 11) is denied; and 3 3. Respondents are directed to file a response to petitioner’s habeas petition 4 within sixty days from the date of this order. See Rule 4, Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. 5 DATED: March 29, 2013. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?