Scott v. Hubbard

Filing 5

ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento to Fresno (1:12-cv-850 SKO (HC)) signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/24/12. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CURTIS SCOTT, 11 12 13 Petitioner, No. CIV S-12-1139 DAD P vs. SUSAN HUBBARD, 14 Respondent. 15 ORDER / 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of 17 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma 18 pauperis. 19 In his application, petitioner challenges a classification committee decision by 20 prison officials at Corcoran State Prison. Petitioner is currently incarcerated at Corcoran State 21 Prison, which is located in Kings County. Kings County is part of the Fresno Division of the 22 United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d). 23 Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in 24 the proper division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper 25 division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the 26 court. This court will not rule on petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis. 1 1 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. This court has not ruled on petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis; 3 2. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern 4 District of California sitting in Fresno; and 5 6 3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at: 7 United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721 8 9 10 DATED: May 24, 2012. 11 12 13 14 DAD:9 scot1139.109 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?