Gcube Insurance Services, Inc. v. Lindsay Corporation

Filing 50

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 8/8/2013 STRIKING all allegations of attorneys' fees against Project Assistance Corporation contained in 21 Third Party Complaint for negligence, equitable indemnity, equitable contribution and declaratory relief, specifically paragraphs 37, 42, 46 and the prayer for relief for the four causes of action. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Jill A. Franklin, SBN 128280 Yaron F. Dunkel, SBN 215873 SCHAFFER, LAX McNAUGHTON & CHEN A Professional Corporation 515 South Figueroa Street, Suite 1400 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Tel: (213) 337-1000 Fax: (213) 337-1010 franklinj@slmclaw.com; dunkely@slmclaw.com Attorneys for Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff: LINDSAY CORPORATION 8 9 10 11 12 13 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Timothy M. Blaine, SBN 124176 Christopher M. Egan, SBN 232301 Clayton T. Cook, SBN 260891 350 University Ave., Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95825 Tel: (916) 929-1481 Fax: (916) 927-3706 E-mails: tblaine@porterscott.com; cegan@porterscott.com; ccook@porterscott.com 14 15 Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant: PROJECT ASSISTANCE CORP. (formerly known as MATERIAL INTEGRITY SOLUTIONS, INC.) 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 GCUBE INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 2:12-cv-01163-WBS-CKD 21 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STRIKE ATTORNEYS’ FEE CLAIM AGAINST PROJECT ASSISTANCE CORPORATION FROM LINDSAY CORPORATION’S THIRDPARTY COMPLAINT Plaintiff, 22 23 v. 24 LINDSAY CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 25 Complaint Filed: Cross-Complaint Filed: 26 27 April 30, 2012 March 1, 2013 Defendants. ____________________________________/ 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STRIKE ATTORNEYS’ FEE CLAIM AGAINST PROJECT ASSISTANCE CORPORATION FROM LINDSAY CORPORATION’S THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT {01152312.DOCX} 1 LINDSAY CORPORATION, Third-Party Plaintiff, 2 v. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 AREVA SOLAR, INC., AUSRA CA I, LLC now known as AREVA SOLAR CA I, LLC; SPECIAL SERVICES CONTRACTORS, INC.; LLOYD W. AUBRY CO., INC.; MATERIAL INTEGRITY SOLUTIONS, INC. and ZOES 1 through 50, Inclusive, Third-Party Defendants. ____________________________________/ 10 Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff LINDSAY CORPORATION, by and through its 11 attorney of record, hereby stipulates to strike all allegations of attorneys’ fees in its Third-Party 12 Complaint against PROJECT ASSISTANCE CORPORATION (formerly known as 13 MATERIAL INTEGRITY SOLUTIONS), specifically paragraphs 37, 42, 46 and the prayer for 14 relief for the four causes of action. The parties agree to this stipulation by original or facsimile 15 signatures. 16 17 Dated: July 31, 2013 SCHAFFER, LAX, McNAUGHTON & CHEN 18 By: /s/ Jill A. Franklin (authorized on 07/31/13) Jill A. Franklin Yaron F. Dunkel Attorneys for Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff LINDSAY CORPORATION 19 20 21 22 23 Dated: August 7, 2013 PORTER SCOTT A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 24 25 By: /s/ Clayton T. Cook Timothy M. Blaine Christopher M. Egan Clayton T. Cook Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant PROJECT ASSISTANCE CORP. 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STRIKE ATTORNEYS’ FEE CLAIM AGAINST PROJECT ASSISTANCE CORPORATION FROM LINDSAY CORPORATION’S THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT {01152312.DOCX} ORDER 1 2 The parties having so stipulated, IT IS ORDERED that all allegations of attorneys’ fees 3 4 against PROJECT ASSISTANCE CORPORATION (fka MATERIAL INTEGRITY 5 SOLUTIONS, INC.) contained in LINDSAY CORPORATION’s Third-Party Complaint for 6 negligence, equitable indemnity, equitable contribution and declaratory relief, specifically 7 paragraphs 37, 42, 46 and the prayer for relief for the four causes of action, are hereby stricken. 8 Dated: August 8, 2013 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STRIKE ATTORNEYS’ FEE CLAIM AGAINST PROJECT ASSISTANCE CORPORATION FROM LINDSAY CORPORATION’S THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT {01152312.DOCX}

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?