Gcube Insurance Services, Inc. v. Lindsay Corporation
Filing
50
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 8/8/2013 STRIKING all allegations of attorneys' fees against Project Assistance Corporation contained in 21 Third Party Complaint for negligence, equitable indemnity, equitable contribution and declaratory relief, specifically paragraphs 37, 42, 46 and the prayer for relief for the four causes of action. (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Jill A. Franklin, SBN 128280
Yaron F. Dunkel, SBN 215873
SCHAFFER, LAX McNAUGHTON & CHEN
A Professional Corporation
515 South Figueroa Street, Suite 1400
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Tel: (213) 337-1000
Fax: (213) 337-1010
franklinj@slmclaw.com; dunkely@slmclaw.com
Attorneys for Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff: LINDSAY CORPORATION
8
9
10
11
12
13
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Timothy M. Blaine, SBN 124176
Christopher M. Egan, SBN 232301
Clayton T. Cook, SBN 260891
350 University Ave., Suite 200
Sacramento, California 95825
Tel: (916) 929-1481
Fax: (916) 927-3706
E-mails: tblaine@porterscott.com; cegan@porterscott.com; ccook@porterscott.com
14
15
Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant: PROJECT ASSISTANCE CORP. (formerly known as
MATERIAL INTEGRITY SOLUTIONS, INC.)
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20
GCUBE INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., a
California corporation,
CASE NO. 2:12-cv-01163-WBS-CKD
21
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO STRIKE ATTORNEYS’
FEE CLAIM AGAINST PROJECT
ASSISTANCE CORPORATION FROM
LINDSAY CORPORATION’S THIRDPARTY COMPLAINT
Plaintiff,
22
23
v.
24
LINDSAY CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation, and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,
25
Complaint Filed:
Cross-Complaint Filed:
26
27
April 30, 2012
March 1, 2013
Defendants.
____________________________________/
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STRIKE ATTORNEYS’ FEE CLAIM AGAINST
PROJECT ASSISTANCE CORPORATION FROM LINDSAY CORPORATION’S
THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT
{01152312.DOCX}
1
LINDSAY CORPORATION,
Third-Party Plaintiff,
2
v.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
AREVA SOLAR, INC., AUSRA CA I, LLC
now known as AREVA SOLAR CA I, LLC;
SPECIAL SERVICES CONTRACTORS,
INC.; LLOYD W. AUBRY CO., INC.;
MATERIAL INTEGRITY SOLUTIONS,
INC. and ZOES 1 through 50, Inclusive,
Third-Party Defendants.
____________________________________/
10
Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff LINDSAY CORPORATION, by and through its
11
attorney of record, hereby stipulates to strike all allegations of attorneys’ fees in its Third-Party
12
Complaint against PROJECT ASSISTANCE CORPORATION (formerly known as
13
MATERIAL INTEGRITY SOLUTIONS), specifically paragraphs 37, 42, 46 and the prayer for
14
relief for the four causes of action. The parties agree to this stipulation by original or facsimile
15
signatures.
16
17
Dated: July 31, 2013
SCHAFFER, LAX, McNAUGHTON & CHEN
18
By: /s/ Jill A. Franklin (authorized on 07/31/13)
Jill A. Franklin
Yaron F. Dunkel
Attorneys for Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff
LINDSAY CORPORATION
19
20
21
22
23
Dated: August 7, 2013
PORTER SCOTT
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
24
25
By: /s/ Clayton T. Cook
Timothy M. Blaine
Christopher M. Egan
Clayton T. Cook
Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant
PROJECT ASSISTANCE CORP.
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STRIKE ATTORNEYS’ FEE CLAIM AGAINST
PROJECT ASSISTANCE CORPORATION FROM LINDSAY CORPORATION’S
THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT
{01152312.DOCX}
ORDER
1
2
The parties having so stipulated, IT IS ORDERED that all allegations of attorneys’ fees
3
4
against
PROJECT
ASSISTANCE
CORPORATION
(fka
MATERIAL
INTEGRITY
5
SOLUTIONS, INC.) contained in LINDSAY CORPORATION’s Third-Party Complaint for
6
negligence, equitable indemnity, equitable contribution and declaratory relief, specifically
7
paragraphs 37, 42, 46 and the prayer for relief for the four causes of action, are hereby stricken.
8
Dated: August 8, 2013
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STRIKE ATTORNEYS’ FEE CLAIM AGAINST
PROJECT ASSISTANCE CORPORATION FROM LINDSAY CORPORATION’S
THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT
{01152312.DOCX}
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?