Gcube Insurance Services, Inc. v. Lindsay Corporation

Filing 90

ORDER granting 79 Motion for determination of good faith settlement and dismissal signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/24/14. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Timothy M. Blaine, SBN 124176 Christopher M. Egan, SBN 232301 Clayton T. Cook, SBN 260891 350 University Ave., Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95825 Tel: (916) 929-1481 Fax: (916) 927-3706 E-mails: tblaine@porterscott.com; cegan@porterscott.com; ccook@porterscott.com Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant PROJECT ASSISTANCE CORP. (formerly known as MATERIAL INTEGRITY SOLUTIONS, INC.) 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PORTER | SCOTT 350 University Ave., Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95825 TEL: 916.929.1481 FAX: 916.927.3706 12 GCUBE INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., a California corporation, 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 16 17 18 19 20 LINDSAY CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. _________________________________/ LINDSAY CORPORATION, 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 2:12-cv-01163-WBS-CKD ORDER GRANTING PROJECT ASSISTANCE CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL (C.C.P § 877.6) DATE: TIME: CTRM: JUDGE: June 30, 2014 2:00 p.m. 5 William B. Shubb Complaint Filed: Cross-Complaint Filed: April 30, 2012 March 1, 2013 Third-Party Plaintiff, v. AREVA SOLAR, INC., AUSRA CA I, LLC now known as AREVA SOLAR CA I, LLC; SPECIAL SERVICES CONTRACTORS, INC.; LLOYD W. AUBRY CO., INC.; MATERIAL INTEGRITY SOLUTIONS, INC. and ZOES 1 through 50, Inclusive, Third-Party Defendants. _________________________________/ 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PROJECT ASSISTANCE CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL (C.C.P § 877.6) {01263842.DOCX} 1 Good cause appearing, Third-Party Defendant PROJECT ASSISTANCE 2 CORPORATION’s (PAC’s) motion for determination of good faith settlement and dismissal is 3 granted. 4 5 THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that PAC’s settlement with Plaintiff was entered into in good faith pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure sections 877 and 877.6. 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 7 877.6(c), the settlement involving PROJECT ASSISTANCE CORPORATION bars any and all 8 present or future claims against PROJECT ASSISTANCE CORPORATION for equitable 9 comparative contribution, or partial or comparative indemnity, based on comparative negligence or 10 11 PORTER | SCOTT 350 University Ave., Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95825 TEL: 916.929.1481 FAX: 916.927.3706 12 13 14 comparative fault. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Third-Party Complaint of Lindsay Corporation as to PAC is dismissed with prejudice. The June 30, 2014 hearing date is hereby vacated, and no appearance is required. IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 Dated: June 24, 2014 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PROJECT ASSISTANCE CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL (C.C.P § 877.6) {01263842.DOCX} 1 2 Gcube Insurance Services, Inc. v. Lindsay Corporation U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 2:12-cv-01163-WBS-CKD 3 PROOF OF SERVICE 4 5 6 I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County of Sacramento. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the above-entitled action; my business address is 350 University Avenue, Suite 200, Sacramento, CA 95825. 7 8 9 10 11 PORTER | SCOTT 350 University Ave., Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95825 TEL: 916.929.1481 FAX: 916.927.3706 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 On the date referenced below, I served the following document(s): [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PROJECT ASSISTANCE CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL (C.C.P § 877.6) X BY MAIL. I am familiar with this Company's practice whereby the mail, after being placed in a designated area, is given the appropriate postage and is deposited in a U. S. mailbox in the City of Sacramento, California, after the close of the day’s business. _____ BY PERSONAL SERVICE. I caused such document to be delivered by hand to the office of the person(s) listed below. _____ BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY. I caused such document to be delivered by overnight delivery to the office of the person(s) listed below. _____ BY FACSIMILE. I caused such document to be faxed to the office of the person(s) listed below with an original or copy of said document placed in the United States mail with postage thereon fully prepaid at Sacramento, California. addressed as follows: 20 PLEASE SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST 21 22 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and was executed on May 9, 2014, at Sacramento, California. 23 /s/ Sunita Narayan Sunita Narayan 24 25 26 27 28 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PROJECT ASSISTANCE CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL (C.C.P § 877.6) {01263842.DOCX} SERVICE LIST 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 PORTER | SCOTT 350 University Ave., Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95825 TEL: 916.929.1481 FAX: 916.927.3706 12 13 14 Counsel for Plaintiff: Jonathan A. Miles Carissa M. Beecham Edward C. Duckers STOEL RIVES LLP 500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1600 Sacramento, CA 95814 Tel: (916) 447-0700 Fax: (916) 447-4781 Def/Third-Party Plaintiff Lindsay Corporation: Jill A. Franklin Yaron F. Dunkel SCHAFFER, LAX McNAUGHTON & CHEN 515 South Figueroa Street, Suite 1400 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Tel: (213) 337-1000 Fax: (213) 337-1010 franklinj@slmclaw.com; dunkely@slmclaw.com jamiles@stoel.com; cmbeecham@stoel.com; ecduckers@stoel.com Third-Party Defendant Special Services Contractors, Inc.: Brian A. Gonsalves RESNICK & LOUIS, P.C. 9891 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92618 Tel: (714) 709-4400 Fax: (602) 456-6256 BGonsalves@rlattorneys.com 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PROJECT ASSISTANCE CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL (C.C.P § 877.6) {01263842.DOCX}

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?