Fox v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 4

ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 6/6/2012 ORDERING that the 3 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED. Plaintiff's 2 application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Plaintiff shall pay the filing fee of $350.00 within twenty-one days from the date of this order, or the Clerk of Court is directed to close this file. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES FOX, Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 No. CIV-S-12-1187-WBS KJN MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, 14 15 Defendant. __________________________________/ ORDER On May 10, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 16 17 were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 18 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 19 20 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 21 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 22 1983). 23 24 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 25 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 26 1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed May 10, 2012, are ADOPTED; 1 1 2. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt No. 2) is denied; and 2 3. Plaintiff shall pay the filing fee of $350.00 within twenty-one days from the date of 3 this order, or the Clerk of Court is directed to close this file. 4 DATED: June 6, 2012 5 6 7 8 9 10 fox1187.3.jo 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?