Lyons v. Vroman et al

Filing 10

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/28/12 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BART LYONS, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, No. 2:12-cv-1191 GEB GGH P vs. MICHAEL VROMAN, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / 16 By order filed July 11, 2012, the court granted plaintiff twenty-eight days to file 17 an amended complaint. In the July 11th order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in 18 his complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an 19 amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 20 For the reasons given in the July 11, 2012, order, IT IS HEREBY 21 RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. 22 Civ. P. 41(b). 23 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 24 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 25 fourteen (14) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file 26 written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 1 1 Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and 2 served within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 3 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 4 DATED: August 28, 2012 5 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 GGH:009 lyon1191.fta 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?