Morris v. Nangalama et al
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/8/13 ADOPTING IN FULL 21 Findings and Recommendations; plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is REVOKED; and plaintiff shall PAY the filing fee of $350.00 within 14 days from the date of this order. Failure to timely pay the filing fee will result in the dismissal of this action. (cc: CDC). (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
LEON E. MORRIS,
Plaintiff,
11
No. 2:12-cv-01202-MCE-KJN P
v.
12
13
DR. NANGALAMA, et al.,
14
Defendants.
ORDER
/
15
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
16
17
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant
18
to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On January 29, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein
19
20
(ECF No. 21) which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any
21
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither
22
party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
23
24
supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge’s analysis.
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
////
1
1
1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 21) filed January 29, 2013, are
2
ADOPTED IN FULL;
3
2. Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status is REVOKED; and
4
3. Plaintiff shall pay the filing fee of $350.00 within fourteen days from the date
5
of this order. Failure to timely pay the filing fee will result in the dismissal of this
6
action.
7
DATED:
March 8, 2013
8
9
10
__________________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?