Morris v. Nangalama et al

Filing 22

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/8/13 ADOPTING IN FULL 21 Findings and Recommendations; plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is REVOKED; and plaintiff shall PAY the filing fee of $350.00 within 14 days from the date of this order. Failure to timely pay the filing fee will result in the dismissal of this action. (cc: CDC). (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEON E. MORRIS, Plaintiff, 11 No. 2:12-cv-01202-MCE-KJN P v. 12 13 DR. NANGALAMA, et al., 14 Defendants. ORDER / 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 16 17 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant 18 to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 29, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein 19 20 (ECF No. 21) which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 26 //// 1 1 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 21) filed January 29, 2013, are 2 ADOPTED IN FULL; 3 2. Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status is REVOKED; and 4 3. Plaintiff shall pay the filing fee of $350.00 within fourteen days from the date 5 of this order. Failure to timely pay the filing fee will result in the dismissal of this 6 action. 7 DATED: March 8, 2013 8 9 10 __________________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?