Morris v. Nangalama et al
Filing
55
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/02/14 recommending that defendant Vu be dismissed from this action without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LEON E. MORRIS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:12-cv-1202 MCE KJN P
v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
DR. NANGALAMA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
By an order filed September 16, 2014, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return
18
to the court, within sixty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendant Vu.
19
That period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court’s order.
20
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendant Vu be dismissed from this action
21
without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge
22
23
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
24
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
25
with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and
26
Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time
27
////
28
////
1
1
may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th
2
Cir. 1991).
3
Dated: December 2, 2014
4
5
/morr1202.fusm
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?