Morris v. Nangalama et al

Filing 68

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/10/2015 ORDERING that within 21 days, defendants shall file an opposition, or a statement of non-opposition, to plaintiff's 65 motion; and seven days thereafter, plaintiff shall file a reply. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LEON E. MORRIS,

12
13
14

No. 2:12-cv-1202 MCE KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

NANGALAMA, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42

18

U.S.C. § 1983. On March 16, 2014, plaintiff filed a document styled “Plaintiff’s Motion

19

Requesting Sanctions and Judicial Intervention. . . .” (ECF No. 65.) However, in essence,

20

plaintiff’s motion is a motion to compel discovery responses. Accordingly, the parties are

21

required to brief this motion pursuant to Local Rule 230(l). (ECF No. 12 at 3:4-8.)

22

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days, defendants shall file an

23

opposition, or statement of non-opposition, to plaintiff’s March 16, 2015 motion; and seven days

24

thereafter, plaintiff shall file a reply.

25

Dated: April 10, 2015

26
27
/morr1202.fb

28
1