Morris v. Nangalama et al
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/10/2015 ORDERING that within 21 days, defendants shall file an opposition, or a statement of non-opposition, to plaintiff's 65 motion; and seven days thereafter, plaintiff shall file a reply. (Yin, K)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LEON E. MORRIS,
No. 2:12-cv-1202 MCE KJN P
NANGALAMA, et al.,
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1983. On March 16, 2014, plaintiff filed a document styled “Plaintiff’s Motion
Requesting Sanctions and Judicial Intervention. . . .” (ECF No. 65.) However, in essence,
plaintiff’s motion is a motion to compel discovery responses. Accordingly, the parties are
required to brief this motion pursuant to Local Rule 230(l). (ECF No. 12 at 3:4-8.)
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days, defendants shall file an
opposition, or statement of non-opposition, to plaintiff’s March 16, 2015 motion; and seven days
thereafter, plaintiff shall file a reply.
Dated: April 10, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?