Morris v. Nangalama et al

Filing 68

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/10/2015 ORDERING that within 21 days, defendants shall file an opposition, or a statement of non-opposition, to plaintiff's 65 motion; and seven days thereafter, plaintiff shall file a reply. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEON E. MORRIS, 12 13 14 No. 2:12-cv-1202 MCE KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER NANGALAMA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 16, 2014, plaintiff filed a document styled “Plaintiff’s Motion 19 Requesting Sanctions and Judicial Intervention. . . .” (ECF No. 65.) However, in essence, 20 plaintiff’s motion is a motion to compel discovery responses. Accordingly, the parties are 21 required to brief this motion pursuant to Local Rule 230(l). (ECF No. 12 at 3:4-8.) 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days, defendants shall file an 23 opposition, or statement of non-opposition, to plaintiff’s March 16, 2015 motion; and seven days 24 thereafter, plaintiff shall file a reply. 25 Dated: April 10, 2015 26 27 /morr1202.fb 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?