Taylor v. Wurth et al
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/21/13 ordering that defendant Doud is dismissed from this action without prejudice. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT TAYLOR,
12
No. 2:12-cv-01230 DAD P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
WURTH, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
By an order filed August 15, 2013, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to
17
18
the court, within sixty days, a new USM-285 form necessary to effect service on defendant
19
Doud.1 That sixty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the
20
court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Doud is dismissed from
21
this action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
22
Dated: October 21, 2013
23
24
25
26
27
28
DAD:4
tay1230.fusm
1
The USM-285 form initially submitted by plaintiff to serve defendant Doud was returned
unexecuted on August 7, 2013, with a notation by the U.S. Marshal that defendant Doud is no
longer a California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation employee and is believed to
have moved out of the state of California. (ECF No. 19.)
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?