Taylor v. Wurth et al

Filing 25

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/21/13 ordering that defendant Doud is dismissed from this action without prejudice. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT TAYLOR, 12 No. 2:12-cv-01230 DAD P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 WURTH, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 By an order filed August 15, 2013, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to 17 18 the court, within sixty days, a new USM-285 form necessary to effect service on defendant 19 Doud.1 That sixty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the 20 court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Doud is dismissed from 21 this action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 22 Dated: October 21, 2013 23 24 25 26 27 28 DAD:4 tay1230.fusm 1 The USM-285 form initially submitted by plaintiff to serve defendant Doud was returned unexecuted on August 7, 2013, with a notation by the U.S. Marshal that defendant Doud is no longer a California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation employee and is believed to have moved out of the state of California. (ECF No. 19.) 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?