Ingram v. City of Sacramento, et al

Filing 17

NON-RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 06/13/12 ORDERING that Court DECLINES to relate the cases 14 , 15 2:12-cv-0864 KJM GGH PS, 2:12-cv-927 MCE CKD PS, 2:12-cv-1089 JAM CKD PS, 2:12-cv-1233 JAM KJN PS and 2:12-cv-1284 JAM DAD PS. (Benson, A.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

CHADERICK A. INGRAM

10
11
12

Plaintiff,
vs.
CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

13

Defendants.

14
15

/
CHADERICK A. INGRAM

16
17
18

Plaintiff,

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,
Defendants.

20

/
CHADERICK A. INGRAM

22
23
24
25
26

No. CIV S-12-927 MCE CKD PS

vs.

19

21

No. CIV S-12-864 KJM GGH PS

Plaintiff,

No. CIV S-12-1089 JAM CKD PS

vs.
CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,
Defendants.
/

1

CHADERICK A. INGRAM

2
3
4

Plaintiff,
vs.
CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

5

Defendants.

6
7

/
CHADERICK A. INGRAM

8
9
10
11

Plaintiff,

No. CIV S-12-1284 JAM DAD PS

vs.
CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

NON-RELATED CASE ORDER

Defendants.

12
13

No. CIV S-12-1233 JAM KJN PS

/
The court has received the Notice of Related Cases concerning the above-

14

captioned cases, filed June 6, 2012. See E.D. Local Rule 123. The court has, however,

15

determined that it is inappropriate to relate and reassign Civil No. S-12-927 MCE CKD PS, 12-

16

1089 JAM CKD, 12-1233 JAM KJN GGH PS, and 12-1284 JAM DAD GGH PS, to Civil No. S-

17

12-864 KJM GGH PS. The cases involve numerous and different defendants, albeit some of the

18

same defendants appear regularly. More importantly, most of the cases are in stages where

19

dismissal has been recommended, and a final order of adoption is awaiting signature from the

20

district judge. Therefore, the court declines to relate the cases.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 13, 2012

23
24

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
GGH:076/Ingram864.rel.wpd

25
26
2