West v. Dizon

Filing 165

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 03/29/16 ADOPTING IN FULL 141 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING 129 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (Jackson, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MACK A. WEST, Jr., 12 No. 2:12-cv-1293 MCE-EFB P (TEMP) Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 NOEL DIZON, 15 ORDER Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 18 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 28, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 21 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 22 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. 23 ECF No. 141. Despite an extension of time granted to plaintiff, neither party has filed 24 objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 26 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS 27 HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 /// 1 1 2 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 28, 2016 (ECF No. 141) are ADOPTED IN FULL; and 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a “special order” (ECF No. 129), construed as a motion for 4 preliminary injunction, is DENIED. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: March 29, 2016 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?