West v. Dizon
Filing
165
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 03/29/16 ADOPTING IN FULL 141 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING 129 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (Jackson, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MACK A. WEST, Jr.,
12
No. 2:12-cv-1293 MCE-EFB P (TEMP)
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
NOEL DIZON,
15
ORDER
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
17
18
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States
19
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On August 28, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
20
21
herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any
22
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days.
23
ECF No. 141. Despite an extension of time granted to plaintiff, neither party has filed
24
objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
26
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS
27
HEREBY ORDERED that:
28
///
1
1
2
3
1. The findings and recommendations filed August 28, 2016 (ECF No. 141) are
ADOPTED IN FULL; and
2. Plaintiff’s motion for a “special order” (ECF No. 129), construed as a motion for
4
preliminary injunction, is DENIED.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated: March 29, 2016
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?