West v. Dizon

Filing 19

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/14/2013 GRANTING defendant's 18 request to conduct plaintiff's deposition via videoconference; nothing in this order shall be interpreted as requiring the institution in which plaintiff is housed to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 MACK A. WEST JR., 2:12-cv-01293-DAD (PC) 13 14 v. Plaintiff, ORDER TO CONDUCT PLAINTIFF’S DEPOSITION VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE 15 16 N. DIZON, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 Defendant’s request to conduct Plaintiff Mack West’s deposition via videoconference is granted. Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring the institution in which Plaintiff is housed to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available. IT IS SO 22 23 24 ORDERED. Dated: February 14, 2013 25 26 27 28 1 1 DAD:12West1293.vdep 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?