West v. Dizon
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/14/2013 GRANTING defendant's 18 request to conduct plaintiff's deposition via videoconference; nothing in this order shall be interpreted as requiring the institution in which plaintiff is housed to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
12
MACK A. WEST JR.,
2:12-cv-01293-DAD (PC)
13
14
v.
Plaintiff, ORDER TO CONDUCT PLAINTIFF’S
DEPOSITION VIA
VIDEOCONFERENCE
15
16
N. DIZON,
17
Defendant.
18
19
20
21
Defendant’s request to conduct Plaintiff Mack West’s deposition via videoconference is
granted. Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring the institution in which Plaintiff is
housed to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available. IT IS SO
22
23
24
ORDERED.
Dated: February 14, 2013
25
26
27
28
1
1
DAD:12West1293.vdep
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?