West v. Dizon

Filing 76

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/7/14 ORDERING that Defendants motion to file an amended answer 72 is granted. The proposed amended answer attached to the motion as Exhibit A is deemed filed as of January 28, 2014. Plaintiffs motion for additional time 73 is denied as moot.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MACK WEST, Jr.,

12

No. 2:12-cv-1293 MCE DAD P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

NOEL DIZON,

15

ORDER

Defendant.

16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for alleged violations of his

17
18

civil rights, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant has moved to file an amended answer (Doc.

19

No. 72.) Good cause appearing, the motion will be granted.
Plaintiff has moved for additional time in which to reply to defendant’s opposition to

20
21

plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the undersigned’s December 11, 2013 order. (Doc. No.

22

73.) The court has ruled on the motion for reconsideration. Therefore plaintiff’s request for

23

additional time to reply has been rendered moot.

24

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

25

1. Defendant’s motion to file an amended answer (Doc. No. 72) is granted. The

26

proposed amended answer attached to the motion as Exhibit A is deemed filed as of January 28,

27

2014.

28

////
1

1
2

2. Plaintiff’s motion for additional time (Doc. No. 73) is denied as moot.
Dated: February 7, 2014

3
4
5
6

hm
west1293.ord(5)

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2