Dupree v. Johnson et al
Filing
10
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/14/2012 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed with prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
RICHARD JOSE DUPREE, JR.
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
No. 2:12-cv-1295 KJM GGH P
vs.
EARVIN (MAGIC) JOHNSON, et al.
14
Defendants.
15
FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
/
16
By order filed September 25, 2012, the court directed plaintiff, within twenty-
17
eight days, either to show cause why he should not be barred from proceed in forma pauperis,
18
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), or to pay the filing fee. The twenty-eight day period has now
19
expired, and plaintiff has not shown cause, paid the filing fee, or otherwise responded to the
20
court’s order.
21
For the reasons given in the September 25, 2012, order, IT IS HEREBY
22
RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R.
23
Civ. P. 41(b).
24
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District
25
Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within
26
fourteen (14) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file
1
1
written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate
2
Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and
3
served within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file
4
objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order.
5
DATED: November 14, 2012
6
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
dupr1295.fsc
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?