Datatel Solutions, Inc., v. Keane Telecom Consulting, LLC, et al
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/27/2012 ORDERING that the 12/5/2012 hearing on plaintiff's 19 motion for default judgment is CONTINUED to 1/16/2013 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 8. On or before 12/19/2012, plaintiff shall either withdraw the motion for default judgment or shall file and serve on defendants a supplemental brief and/or declaration(s) demonstrating that service of the summons and complaint on defendants was proper under California Civil Procedure Code sections 415.40 and 417.20(a). Within seven days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall serve a copy of this order on defendants. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
DATATEL SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12
13
14
15
16
No. 2:12-cv-1306-GEB-EFB
KEANE TELECOM CONSULTING, LLC,
a New Jersey limited liability company;
OUTREACH TELECOM AND
ENERGY, LLC, a New Jersey limited
liability company; and DOES 1-10, inclusive,
ORDER
Defendants.
_________________________________/
17
18
Presently noticed for hearing on December 5, 2012 is plaintiff’s motion for default
19
judgment against defendants Keane Telecom Consulting, LLC and Outreach Telecom and
20
Energy, LLC (“defendants”). Dckt. No. 19. The matter is before the undersigned pursuant to
21
Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(19) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
According to plaintiff’s default judgment motion, as well as the proof of service plaintiff
22
23
filed on July 31, 2012, defendants were served on May 18, 2012 “by certified mail of [their]
24
agent for service of process.” Dckt. No. 20 at 2; see also Dckt. No. 6. However, the court
25
cannot discern from the docket whether service of process was properly effected.
26
////
1
1
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(h)(1) provides that, where service is not waived, a
2
domestic or foreign corporation, or a partnership or other unincorporated association that is
3
subject to suit under a common name, must be served by either following state law from the state
4
where the action is pending or where service was effected, see Rules 4(h)(1)(A) and 4(e)(1), or
5
“by delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to an officer, a managing or general
6
agent, or any other agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process
7
and--if the agent is one authorized by statute and the statute so requires--by also mailing a copy
8
of each to the defendant,” see Rule 4(h)(1)(B). Here, plaintiff did not deliver a copy of the
9
summons and complaint as provided in Rule 4(h)(1)(B); rather, plaintiff sent the summons and
10
complaint by certified mail to defendants’ purported agent for service of process, Peter Keane, in
11
Naples, Florida. Therefore, the court looks to state law to determine whether service was proper.
12
Plaintiff contends that service of process was proper under California Civil Procedure
13
Code section 415.40. Dckt. No. 8 at 2. Section 415.40 provides that “A summons may be
14
served on a person outside this state in any manner provided by this article or by sending a copy
15
of the summons and of the complaint to the person to be served by first-class mail, postage
16
prepaid, requiring a return receipt. Service of a summons by this form of mail is deemed
17
complete on the 10th day after such mailing.” Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 415.40. To prove service
18
by mail on a nonresident pursuant to Section 415.40, there must be hard evidence of actual
19
delivery — either a signed receipt or other proof that the defendant (or someone authorized by
20
defendant) actually received the mail. Id. § 417.20(a) (“If served in a manner specified in a
21
statute of this state, as prescribed by Section 417.10, and if service is made by mail pursuant to
22
Section 415.40, proof of service shall include evidence satisfactory to the court establishing
23
actual delivery to the person to be served, by a signed return receipt or other evidence . . . .”); see
24
also Neadeau v. Foster, 129 Cal. App. 3d 234, 237-38 (1982); Cruz v. Fagor America, Inc., 146
25
Cal. App. 4th 488, 498-99 (2007). Service by mail on a nonresident requires strict compliance
26
with Section 417.20(a). Bolkiah v. Sup. Ct. (Bijan Fragrances, Inc.), 74 Cal. App. 4th 984, 1001
2
1
2
(1999).
Here, plaintiff has offered evidence demonstrating that the summons and complaint were
3
sent to defendants’ purported agent for service of process via certified mail with return receipt
4
requested. Dckt. No. 6 at 3. Plaintiff has also provided evidence that someone acknowledged
5
receipt of the summons and complaint upon delivery on May 22, 2012. Dckt. No. 6 at 4, 8.
6
However, plaintiff has not provided evidence demonstrating that the person purportedly served,
7
Peter Keane, is defendants’ registered agent for service of process or that the address at which
8
service was effected was the proper address for service. Nor is it clear from the evidence
9
provided who actually signed the receipts of service. Id. Therefore, the court cannot discern
10
whether defendants and/or their registered agent(s) for service of process (or someone authorized
11
by them) actually received the summons and complaint, as required by Section 417.20(a).
12
In light of the requirement that Section 417.20(a) be strictly enforced, the hearing on
13
plaintiff’s default judgment motion will be continued and plaintiff will be directed to provide
14
further information and evidence demonstrating that service on defendants was proper under
15
California Civil Procedure Code sections 415.40 and 417.20(a).
16
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
17
1. The December 5, 2012 hearing on plaintiff’s motion for default judgment, Dckt. No.
18
19
19, is continued to January 16, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 8.
2. On or before December 19, 2012, plaintiff shall either withdraw the motion for default
20
judgment or shall file and serve on defendants a supplemental brief and/or declaration(s)
21
demonstrating that service of the summons and complaint on defendants was proper under
22
California Civil Procedure Code sections 415.40 and 417.20(a).
23
24
3. Within seven days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall serve a copy of this order on
defendants.
25
SO ORDERED.
26
DATED: November 27, 2012.
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?