Datatel Solutions, Inc., v. Keane Telecom Consulting, LLC, et al
Filing
27
STIPULATON and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 12/4/2012 WITHDRAWING 13 , 19 Motions for Default Judgment; VACATING the Motion Hearings as to 13 , 19 Motions for Default Judgment; VACATING 9 , 10 Clerk's Entries of Defa ult; REFERRING case to this Court's Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program; GRANTING 90 days leave of court to complete alternative dispute resolution; in the event alternative dispute resolution fails to resolve this case, ORDERING Defendant to r espond to Plaintiff's 2 Complaint 14 days after the conclusion of alternative dispute resolution; CONTINUING the Pretrial Scheduling Conference to 4/15/2013 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. (cc: VDRP) (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Glenn W. Peterson, Esq. (SBN 126173)
MILLSTONE, PETERSON & WATTS, LLP
2267 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 210
Roseville, CA 95661
Telephone: (916) 780-8222
Fax No: (916) 780-8775
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
Datatel Solutions, Inc.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
DATATEL SOLUTIONS, INC., a California
corporation,
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
15
16
17
KEANE TELECOM CONSULTING, LLC, a
New Jersey limited liability company;
OUTREACH TELECOM AND ENERGY,
LLC, a New Jersey limited liability company;
and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Case No.: 2:12-CV-01306-GEB-EFB
GENERAL APPEARANCE BY
SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO
DEFENDANTS; STIPULATION TO
VACATE ENTRY OF DEFAULT, FOR
REFERRAL TO VDRP AND RELATED
RELIEF
______________________________________
Complaint Filed:
Trial Date:
May 14, 2012
Not Set
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS, by and through their respective undersigned counsel,
hereby stipulate and agree as follows.
22
OUTREACH TECHNOLOGY, LLC, as the alleged successor-in-interest to named
23
defendants KEANE
24
ENERGY, LLC, retained the undersigned counsel (“defense counsel”) after Plaintiff’s application
25
for entry of default judgment (Doc. 13) was filed and the time to oppose same had expired. On
26
November 26, 2012, defense counsel contacted plaintiff’s counsel and requested a stipulation to
27
withdraw the application. Plaintiff’s counsel refused. On November 30, 2012, plaintiff’s counsel
28
///
TELECOM CONSULTING, LLC and OUTREACH TELECOM AND
PLAINTIFF’S STATUS REPORT
1
and defense counsel reach a stipulated resolution of the pending application for entry of judgment,
2
the complete terms of which are as follows (subject to court approval):
3
1. OUTREACH TECHNOLOGY, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, as the putative
4
successor-in-interest to named Defendants, KEANE TELECOM CONSULTING, LLC, a
5
New Jersey limited liability company and OUTREACH TELECOM AND ENERGY,
6
LLC, a New Jersey limited liability company, without waiving any rights and/or defenses
7
available to it, including without limitation jurisdictional, procedural and substantive
8
defenses, if any, hereby generally appears in this action for the purpose of entering this
9
stipulation and proceeding with mediation pursuant to Section 16 of the SP Agreement as
10
amended in 2010. Similarly, plaintiff waives no rights or claims presently alleged in the
11
complaint, including without limitation the claim that the named defendants were not and
12
are not now predecessors in interest of Outreach Technology, LLC.
13
2. Plaintiff hereby withdraws the pending application for entry of judgment without
14
prejudice and requests that the Court vacate the hearing date on same.
3. Plaintiff hereby stipulates to and requests an Order vacating the Clerk’s entry of default
15
16
in this matter on August 2, 2012.
17
4. In lieu of the ADR (alternative dispute resolution) provisions in the contract in suit, the
18
parties’ hereby request referral to this Court’s Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program
19
(“VDRP”) and 90 days’ leave of court to complete ADR therein.
20
5. Should ADR fail to resolve this case, the parties shall return to the status quo ante and
21
Defendant(s) shall file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s complaint not later than 14
22
days after the ADR session has been concluded.
23
6. If this stipulation is accepted by the Court, the parties jointly request that the Court
24
schedule the initial Joint Status/Scheduling Conference on a date convenient to the Court,
25
but approximately 120 days from entry of the order on this stipulation.
26
7. The Court may adopt this stipulation and enter it as an order binding upon the parties.
27
///
28
///
2
PLAINTIFF’S STATUS REPORT
1
8. This stipulation is subject to Court approval. Should the Court decline to approve it, the
2
parties agree that they shall restore the status quo (by further stipulations if necessary)
3
existing as of 5 p.m. on November 30, 2012.
4
5
6
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: November 30, 2012
7
MILLSTONE, PETERSON & WATTS, LLP
Attorneys at Law
8
By:
9
10
/s/ Glenn W. Peterson
GLENN W. PETERSON
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Datatel Solutions Inc.
11
12
I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a
"conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.
MILLSTONE PETERSON & WATTS, LLP /s/ Glenn W. Peterson
13
14
15
DATED: December 4, 2012
16
17
MURPHY CAMPBELL GUTHRIE &
ALLISTON
Attorneys at Law
By:
18
19
Attorneys for Outreach Technology, LLC as
successor-in- interest to Keane Telecom Consulting,
LLC and Outreach Telecom and Energy, LLC.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
/s/ J. Douglas Durham
J. DOUGLAS DURHAM
I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a
"conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.
MURPHY CAMPBELL GUTHRIE & ALLISTON /s/ J. Douglas Durham
The parties’ stipulation is approved. The pretrial scheduling conference, currently set for
March 18, 2013, is rescheduled for April 15, 2013, at 9:00 am. A joint status report shall be filed
fourteen days prior to the hearing.
Date: 12/4/2012
___________________________________
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
Senior United States District Judge
3
PLAINTIFF’S STATUS REPORT
1
DEAC_Signature-END:
2
3
4
5
6
7
61KHH4BB
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
PLAINTIFF’S STATUS REPORT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?