Datatel Solutions, Inc., v. Keane Telecom Consulting, LLC, et al

Filing 67

ORDER and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 11/20/2014 ORDERING Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing by 12/1/2014 why sanctions should not imposed for failure to file a timely status report. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Status Conference is CONTINUED to 2/9/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. Status Report due 14 days prior to the status conference.(Donati, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 DATATEL SOLUTIONS, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, 9 v. 10 11 12 13 KEANE TELECOM CONSULTING, LLC, a New Jersey limited liability company; OUTREACH TELECOM AND ENERGY, LLC, a New Jersey limited liability company, 14 No. 2:12-cv-01306-GEB-EFB ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE Defendants. 15 16 The July 22, 2014, Order to Show Cause scheduled a 17 status conference in this case on November 24, 2014, and required 18 Plaintiff to “file a status report no later than fourteen (14) 19 days prior to the status conference in which it explains the 20 status of the default proceedings.” (OSC 2:7-9, ECF No. 60.) No 21 status report was filed as ordered. 22 Therefore, Plaintiff is Ordered to Show Cause (“OSC”) 23 in a writing to be filed no later than December 1, 2014, why 24 sanctions should not be imposed against it and/or its counsel 25 under Rule 16(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for 26 failure to file a timely status report.1 The written response 27 1 28 This is the second occasion in which Plaintiff has failed to timely file a status report. 1 1 shall also state whether Plaintiff or its counsel is at fault, 2 and whether a hearing is requested on the OSC.2 If a hearing is 3 requested, it will be held on February 9, 2015, at 9:00 a.m., 4 just prior to the status conference, which is rescheduled to that 5 date and time. Plaintiff shall file a status report no later than 6 fourteen (14) days prior to the status conference in which it 7 explains the status of the default proceedings. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 20, 2014 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 “If the fault lies with the attorney, that is where the impact of sanction should be lodged. If the fault lies with the clients, that is where the impact of the sanction should be lodged.” In re Sanction of Baker, 744 F.2d 1438, 1442 (10th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1014 (1985). Sometimes the faults of attorneys, and their consequences, are visited upon clients. Myers v. Shekter (In re Hill), 775 F.2d 1385, 1387 (9th Cir. 1985). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?