Craythorn v. WesTower Communications, Inc.
Filing
58
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/4/14 GRANTING 54 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement. Final Approval Hearing set for 4/8/2015 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. All briefs in support of proposed settlement due by 3/20/15. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
TROY CRAYTHORN, individually,
and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
WESTOWER COMMUNICATIONS,
INC., a Delaware Corporation,
No.
2:12-cv-01328-JAM-EFB
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION
SETTLEMENT, CONDITIONAL
CERTIFICATION, APPROVAL OF CLASS
NOTICE, AND SETTING OF FINAL
APPROVAL HEARING
16
Defendant.
17
18
The Court, having fully reviewed the Motion for Order
19
Granting Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, the
20
supporting Points and Authorities, Declarations of Isam C. Khoury
21
and Cris Vaughan, the Settlement Agreement, Notice of Class
22
Action Settlement, and the statement of non-opposition by
23
Defendant WesTower Communications, Inc. (“Defendant”), and in
24
recognition of the Court’s duty to make a preliminary
25
determination as to the reasonableness of any proposed class
26
action settlement and, if preliminarily determined to be
27
reasonable, to ensure proper notice is provided to Class Members
28
in accordance with due process requirements, and to conduct a
1
1
Final Approval hearing as to the good faith, fairness, adequacy
2
and reasonableness of any proposed settlement, HEREBY MAKES THE
3
FOLLOWING DETERMINATIONS AND ORDERS:
4
1. The Court finds, on a preliminary basis, that the
5
Settlement Agreement incorporated in full by this reference and
6
made a part of this Order Granting Preliminary Approval, appears
7
to be within the range of reasonableness of a settlement which
8
could ultimately be given final approval by this Court. The Court
9
notes that Defendant has agreed to pay the Gross Settlement
10
Amount of $1,140,000.00 in full satisfaction of the claims as
11
more specifically described in the Settlement Agreement.
12
2. The Court also finds that, on a preliminary basis, the
13
Settlement is fair and reasonable to Class Members when balanced
14
against the probable outcome of further litigation relating to
15
class action certification, liability and damages issues, and
16
potential appeals of rulings. The Court further finds that
17
significant investigation, research, litigation, formal and
18
informal discovery have been conducted such that Counsel for the
19
Parties are able to reasonably evaluate their respective
20
positions. The Court further finds that settlement at this time
21
will avoid substantial costs, delay and risks that would be
22
presented by the further prosecution of the litigation, and that
23
the proposed Settlement has been reached as the result of
24
intensive, informed and non-collusive and arm’s-length
25
negotiations between the Parties. ACCORDINGLY, GOOD CAUSE
26
APPEARING, THE MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION
27
SETTLEMENT IS HEREBY GRANTED.
28
3. As a part of said preliminary approval, the Court hereby
2
1
accepts and incorporates the Parties’ Settlement Agreement and
2
hereby conditionally certifies the following class of persons,
3
for settlement purposes only, pursuant to the terms and
4
conditions contained in said Settlement Agreement:
5
6
7
A. “Class” or “Classes” mean all members of the
following classes:
1.
The “Roseville Class”: all non-exempt field
8
civil technicians, tower technicians,
9
electricians, and foremen employed by WesTower
10
and who worked out of a Northern California
11
location at any time during the period of
12
March 9, 2008 through July 30, 2014. [There
13
are an estimated 213 members of the Roseville
14
Class.]
15
a. “Roseville Subclass”: all Roseville Class
16
members employed at any time on or after
17
March 9, 2009 and who were no longer
18
employed as of July 30, 2014. [There are
19
an estimated 114 members of the Roseville
20
Subclass.]
21
2. The “Los Angeles Class”: all non-exempt Foremen
22
employed by WesTower and who worked out of a
23
Southern California location at any time during
24
the period of March 9, 2008 through July 30,
25
2014. [There are an estimated 67 members of the
26
Los Angeles Class.]
27
28
a. “Los Angeles Subclass”: all Los Angeles
Class members employed at any time on or
3
1
after March 9, 2009 and who were no
2
longer employed as of July 30, 2014.
3
[There are an estimated 37 members of the
4
Los Angeles Subclass.]
5
6
7
8
4. The Court approves and appoints Plaintiff Troy W.
Craythorn as the Class Representative.
5. The Court approves and appoints Cohelan Khoury & Singer
and Vaughan & Associates as Class Counsel.
9
6. The Court approves and appoints CPT Group, Inc., as the
10
Claims Administrator to administrate the Settlement pursuant to
11
the terms of the Settlement Agreement.
12
7. The Court finds that the Notice of Class Action
13
Settlement (“Notice”), the Employment Information Sheet, and
14
Change of Address Form, advise of the pendency of the Class
15
Action, of the proposed Settlement, of the preliminary Court
16
approval of the proposed Settlement, of the automatic payment of
17
a proportionate share of the settlement monies if the Class
18
Member does not request to be excluded; the estimated amount each
19
may expect to receive pursuant to the proposed Settlement;
20
objection timing and procedures, opt-out timing and procedures,
21
and of the Final Approval hearing date. The Court further finds
22
that these documents fairly and adequately advise Class Members
23
of the terms of the proposed Settlement and the benefits
24
available to Class Members thereunder, and of the Final Approval
25
hearing and the right to file documentation in support of or in
26
opposition to the Settlement and to appear in connection with
27
said hearing. The Court further finds that the Notice clearly
28
comport with all constitutional requirements including those of
4
1
due process. ACCORDINGLY, GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, THE COURT HEREBY
2
APPROVES THE PROPOSED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT,
3
EMPLOYMENT INFORMATION SHEET, AND CHANGE OF ADDRESS FORM,
4
ATTACHED AS EXHIBITS TO THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT;
5
8. The Court finds that the mailing to the present and last
6
known address of the members of the above-named Classes
7
constitutes an effective method of notifying Class Members of
8
their rights with respect to the Class Action and Settlement.
9
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
10
(a) Within ten days of this preliminary approval, Defendant
11
shall forward to the appointed Claims Administrator, CPT Group,
12
Inc., (“CPT”) the Class Data List as provided for by the terms of
13
the proposed Settlement.
14
(b) Within thirty days of this preliminary approval CPT
15
shall mail to each Class Member, by first class, postage pre-
16
paid, the Notice of Class Action Settlement, Employment
17
Information Sheet, Change of Address Form, and a pre-printed,
18
postage paid return envelope (collectively the “Notice Packet”);
19
(c) All mailings shall be made to the present and/or last
20
known mailing address of the Class Members based on Defendant’s
21
records, as well as addresses that may be updated and located by
22
the Claims Administrator who will conduct standard address
23
searches in cases of returned mail as set forth in the Settlement
24
Agreement. The Court finds and so orders that the mailing of the
25
Notice Packet to Class Members as set forth in this paragraph is
26
the best means practicable by which to reach Class Members and is
27
reasonable and adequate pursuant to all constitutional and
28
statutory requirements including all due process requirements;
5
1
and
2
9. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:
3
(a) Request to be excluded (“opt-out requests”) must be
4
mailed to the Claims Administrator, postmarked within sixty days
5
of the initial mailing of the Notice Packet to the Class.
6
(b) Objections must be in writing and must explain in clear
7
and concise terms the basis of each objection setting forth the
8
factual and legal arguments in support. All papers in support of
9
the objections must be sent to CPT as described in the Notice
10
within sixty days of the initial mailing of the Notice Packet to
11
the Class.
12
(c) Notice of Intention to Appear at the Final Approval
13
hearing in order to be heard in conjunction with a properly
14
served Objection, must be sent to the CPT as described in the
15
Notice within sixty days from the initial mailing of the Notice
16
Packet to the Class.
17
10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Final Approval hearing
18
shall be held before the undersigned at 9:30 a.m. on April 8,
19
2015 in Courtroom 6, located at the Robert I. Matsui United
20
States Courthouse, 501 I Street, 14th Floor, Sacramento,
21
California 95814, to consider the fairness, adequacy and
22
reasonableness of the proposed Settlement preliminarily approved
23
by this Order of Preliminary Approval, and to consider the
24
application of Class Counsel Cohelan, Khoury & Singer and Vaughan
25
& Associates for an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and
26
litigation expenses, Class Representative service payment to
27
Plaintiff, and for the Claims Administration expenses incurred.
28
11. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all briefs in support of the
6
1
proposed Settlement and the Final Approval hearing shall be
2
served and filed with the Court on or before March 20, 2015.
3
12. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all briefs in support of
4
Class Counsels’ requests for awards of attorneys’ fees and
5
litigation costs, Class Representative service payment and Claims
6
Administration expenses shall be filed with the Court on or
7
before March 20, 2015.
8
9
13. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if, for any reason, the Court
does not execute and file an Order Granting Final Approval and
10
Judgment, or if the Effective Final Settlement Date, as defined
11
by the Settlement Agreement, does not occur for any reason
12
whatsoever, the Settlement Agreement and the proposed Settlement
13
subject of this Order and all evidence and proceedings had in
14
connection therewith, shall be null and void and without
15
prejudice to the status quo ante rights of the Parties to the
16
litigation as more specifically set forth in the Settlement
17
Agreement.
18
14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pending further order of
19
this Court, all proceedings in this matter except those
20
contemplated herein and in the Settlement Agreement are stayed.
21
15. The Court expressly reserves the right to adjourn or
22
continue the Final Approval hearing without further notice to
23
Class Members.
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 4, 2014
26
27
28
7
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?