Valdez v. Cate et al

Filing 88

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/31/2016 ORDERING that this 85 appeal is not frivolous or taken in bad faith. Plaintiffs in forma pauperis status may continue on appeal. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Pro Se Unit at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (cc USCA) (Butolph, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RUBEN VALDEZ, 12 No. 2:12-cv-1352-CMK-P Plaintiff, 13 vs. ORDER 14 MATTHEW CATE, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 / 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to the undersigned by the Ninth Circuit Court of 19 Appeals to certify whether the appeal is taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). The 20 court granted the defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. Having reviewed the entire 21 file, and providing plaintiff with the benefit of any doubt, the court concludes that the appeal is 22 not frivolous or taken in bad faith and plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status should not be revoked. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. This appeal is not frivolous or taken in bad faith; 25 2. Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status may continue on appeal; and 26 /// 1 1 2 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Pro Se Unit at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3 4 5 6 7 DATED: October 31, 2016 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?