Federal National Mortgage Association v. Eugene, et. al.
Filing
4
ORDER ADOPTING 3 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/29/13 REMANDING CASE to Sacramento County Superior Court. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
FEDERAL NATIONAL
MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION,
et al.,
12
13
14
Plaintiffs,
No. 12-cv-1353 KJM DAD PS
vs.
JOHN H. EUGENE, JR.;
JUDY EUGENE,
ORDER
15
16
17
18
19
20
Defendants.
/
Defendants are proceeding pro se in the above-entitled action. The matter was
referred to a United States Magistrate Judge under Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On September 11, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and
21
recommendations, which were served on defendants and which contained notice that any
22
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after
23
service of the findings and recommendations. The fourteen-day period has expired, and
24
defendants have not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
25
26
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United
States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are
1
1
reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.
2
1983). Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to
3
be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
4
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
5
1. The findings and recommendations filed September 11, 2012 (Doc. No. 3) are
6
adopted in full;
7
8
9
10
2. This action is summarily remanded to the Sacramento County Superior Court;
and
3. This case is closed.
DATED: January 29, 2013.
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?