Torres v. Virga
Filing
52
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/13/15 ordering ( Status Conference set for 2/13/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd.) (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JUAN TORRES,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:12-cv-1358 TLN DAD P
v.
ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE
TIM VIRGA, Warden, et al.,
15
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with a petition for a writ of
18
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. By order dated May 20, 2014, this action was
19
stayed for sixty days and petitioner was directed to notify the court and opposing counsel of the
20
status of several petitions for certiorari pending before the United States Supreme Court in the
21
event that the stay had not been lifted before the period of the stay had expired. On July 14, 2014,
22
petitioner filed the required status report. By order dated August 13, 2014, the stay was extended
23
for another sixty days and petitioner’s counsel was directed to notify the court and opposing
24
counsel of the current status of the petition for certiorari filed in DeMola v. Cavazos, Acting
25
Warden, 13-10288 prior to the expiration of the stay. On October 6, 2014, petitioner’s counsel
26
filed the required status report, explaining that the state’s response to the DeMola petition for
27
certiorari was due on or before October 20, 2014.
28
/////
1
1
By order dated October 20, 2014, this action was again stayed for an additional sixty days
2
and petitioner’s counsel was directed to notify the court and opposing counsel of the current
3
status of the petition for certiorari filed in DeMola v. Cavazos, Acting Warden, 13-10288 prior to
4
the expiration of the stay. On December 15, 2014, petitioner’s counsel filed the required status
5
report, explaining that the DeMola case remains pending in the United States Supreme Court and
6
that on December 12, 2014, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Toca v. Louisiana, ___ S. Ct.
7
___, No. 14-6381, 2014 WL 4743531 (Dec. 12, 2014), in order to address, among other issues,
8
the retroactivity of the decision in Miller v. Alabama, ___ U.S. ___, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012).
9
Petitioner’s counsel also advised this court that petitioner expects to complete his investigation
10
into his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel by the end of February 2015, intends to “present
11
new sentencing mitigation and risk assessment information that could not be presented at
12
sentencing,” and plans to “pursue available habeas relief in the state courts.” (ECF No. 51.)
13
After reviewing the record before the court, including petitioner’s December 15, 2014
14
status report, and good cause appearing, the court sets a status conference to discuss scheduling
15
issues including the advisability of continuing the current stay in this matter. The filing of status
16
reports is not required. Any party may appear at the status conference telephonically if the party
17
pre-arranges such appearance by contacting Pete Buzo, the courtroom deputy of the undersigned
18
magistrate judge, at (916) 930-4128, no later than 48 hours before the Status Conference; a land
19
line telephone number must be provided.
20
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a Status Conference is set in this matter for
21
February 13, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 27, before the undersigned.
22
Dated: January 13, 2015
23
24
25
26
DAD:8
Torres1358.sc
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?