Chan et al v. Doctors Hospital Modesto et al
Filing
25
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/26/2012 ORDERING the USA is ORDERED to file a memorandum with the Court within 10 days from the date of this order is electronically filed showing why venue in the USDC sitting in Sacramento is proper under Local Rules; Motion Hearings Reset for 11/15/2012 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Judge Morrison C. England Jr. re 10 Motion to Remand, 5 Motion to Dismiss. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
PEN CHAN and JAMIE CHAVEZ,
a minor by and through his
Guardian Ad Litem, YOLANDA
TORRES,
NO. 2:12-cv-01359-MCE-CKD
13
Plaintiffs,
14
v.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
15
16
DOCTORS HOSPITAL MODESTO,
et al.,
17
Defendants.
18
----oo0oo---19
20
Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), “[w]henever in any action the
21
court finds upon its own motion . . . that an action has not been
22
commenced in the proper court in accordance with this Rule . . .
23
the court may transfer the same to another venue within the
24
District.”
25
by Plaintiffs in the Superior Court of California in and for
26
Stanislaus County.
27
America removed the action to this Court pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
28
233(c) and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441, 2679(d)(2).
The Complaint in this matter was originally brought
On May 18, 2012, Defendant United States of
1
(ECF No. 1.)
1
Examination of Plaintiff’s Complaint shows that the alleged
2
wrongdoing arose at Doctors Hospital Modesto, which is situated
3
in Modesto, California.
4
Stanislaus County, which is part of the Fresno Division of the
5
Unites States Court for the Eastern District of California.
6
Local Rule 120(d).
7
County shall be commenced in Fresno.
8
9
The City of Modesto is located within
See
All civil actions arising in Stanislaus
Id.
Because it appears from the Complaint that this action was
not commenced in the proper court, Defendant United States of
10
America is ordered to file a memorandum with the Court within ten
11
(10) days from the date of this Order is electronically filed
12
showing why venue in the United States District Court sitting in
13
Sacramento is proper under the Local Rules.
14
to file such memorandum, the Court will transfer the instant
15
action to the United States District Court sitting in Fresno.
16
The Court will take no further action in this case until the
17
question of proper venue has been resolved.
18
If Defendant fails
In light of this ruling, the hearing on Defendant’s Motion
19
to Dismiss (ECF No. 5) and Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (ECF
20
No. 10), currently scheduled for November 1, 2012, is hereby
21
vacated and continued to November 15, 2012, at 2 p.m.
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 26, 2012
24
25
26
_____________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?