Chan et al v. Doctors Hospital Modesto et al

Filing 25

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/26/2012 ORDERING the USA is ORDERED to file a memorandum with the Court within 10 days from the date of this order is electronically filed showing why venue in the USDC sitting in Sacramento is proper under Local Rules; Motion Hearings Reset for 11/15/2012 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Judge Morrison C. England Jr. re 10 Motion to Remand, 5 Motion to Dismiss. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 PEN CHAN and JAMIE CHAVEZ, a minor by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, YOLANDA TORRES, NO. 2:12-cv-01359-MCE-CKD 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 15 16 DOCTORS HOSPITAL MODESTO, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 ----oo0oo---19 20 Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), “[w]henever in any action the 21 court finds upon its own motion . . . that an action has not been 22 commenced in the proper court in accordance with this Rule . . . 23 the court may transfer the same to another venue within the 24 District.” 25 by Plaintiffs in the Superior Court of California in and for 26 Stanislaus County. 27 America removed the action to this Court pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 28 233(c) and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441, 2679(d)(2). The Complaint in this matter was originally brought On May 18, 2012, Defendant United States of 1 (ECF No. 1.) 1 Examination of Plaintiff’s Complaint shows that the alleged 2 wrongdoing arose at Doctors Hospital Modesto, which is situated 3 in Modesto, California. 4 Stanislaus County, which is part of the Fresno Division of the 5 Unites States Court for the Eastern District of California. 6 Local Rule 120(d). 7 County shall be commenced in Fresno. 8 9 The City of Modesto is located within See All civil actions arising in Stanislaus Id. Because it appears from the Complaint that this action was not commenced in the proper court, Defendant United States of 10 America is ordered to file a memorandum with the Court within ten 11 (10) days from the date of this Order is electronically filed 12 showing why venue in the United States District Court sitting in 13 Sacramento is proper under the Local Rules. 14 to file such memorandum, the Court will transfer the instant 15 action to the United States District Court sitting in Fresno. 16 The Court will take no further action in this case until the 17 question of proper venue has been resolved. 18 If Defendant fails In light of this ruling, the hearing on Defendant’s Motion 19 to Dismiss (ECF No. 5) and Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (ECF 20 No. 10), currently scheduled for November 1, 2012, is hereby 21 vacated and continued to November 15, 2012, at 2 p.m. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 26, 2012 24 25 26 _____________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?