Azim Ali v. People of California

Filing 5

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/9/12 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. It is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

AZIZ YASIR AZIM ALI,

11

Petitioner,

12

No. 2:12-cv-01366 DAD P

vs.

13

PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA,

14

ORDER AND

Respondents.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
/

15

On May 31, 2012, the court ordered petitioner to file an in forma pauperis

16
17

affidavit or pay the required filing fee within thirty days. The court cautioned petitioner that

18

failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this action. The thirty day period has now

19

expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court’s order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to

20
21

randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action.
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

22
23
24

prejudice.
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

25

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

26

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written
1

1

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

3

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

4

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

5

DATED: July 9, 2012.

6
7
8

DAD:9
ali1366.fifp

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2