Bowen v. Street et al

Filing 6

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 07/11/12 ORDERING Clerk to ASSIGN this action to a U.S. District Judge; case is ASSIGNED to Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd for all further proceedings, the new case number is 2:12-cv-1390 JAM DAD P; and RECOMMENDING that that action be dismissed without prejudice. Objections to these F&Rs due within 14 days; 1 case referred to Judge John A. Mendez. (Benson, A.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

CLIFFORD BOWEN,

11

Plaintiff,

12

vs.

13

No. 2:12-cv-1390 DAD P

M. STREET, et al.,

14

ORDER AND

Defendants.

15

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
/

16

By an order filed June 1, 2012 plaintiff was ordered to file an new in forma

17

pauperis application within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a

18

recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and

19

plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed an in forma pauperis application.

20

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to

21

assign this action to a United States District Judge; and

22
23
24

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice.
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

25

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

26

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
1

1

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

2

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

3

shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are

4

advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the

5

District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

6

DATED: July 11, 2012.

7
8
9
10
11
12

DAD:12
bowe1390.fifp

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2