USA v. State of California, et al
Filing
7
CONSENT DECREE signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 5/29/2012. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Assistant Attorney General
Civil Rights Division
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
4
10
T. CHRISTIAN HERREN, JR.
ABEL GOMEZ
JAYE ALLISON SITTON (D.C. Bar # 453655)
OLIMPIA E. MICHEL (N.Y. Bar # 4358321)
Attorneys, Voting Section
Civil Rights Division
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
NWB 7254
Washington, D.C. 20530
Telephone: (202) 305-4143
Facsimile: (202) 307-3961
11
Attorneys for the United States
5
6
7
8
9
12
13
14
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
18
Plaintiff,
19
CONSENT DECREE
v.
20
CASE NO. 12-CV-1427 WBS
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA; and DEBRA
BOWEN, SECRETARY OF STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, in her official capacity,
21
22
Defendants.
23
24
Plaintiff United States of America (“United States”) initiated this action against the State of
25
California (the “State”) and the State of California’s Secretary of State, Debra Bowen, in her official
26
capacity (“Secretary of State”), to enforce the requirements of the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens
27
Absentee Voting Act (“UOCAVA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973ff to 1973ff-7. The United States alleges
28
violations of UOCAVA arising from the failure in 11 counties—despite repeated notifications by the
Consent Decree
1
1
Secretary of State—to transmit absentee ballots to all absent uniformed services voters and overseas
2
voters by the 45th day before the June 5, 2012 Federal primary election. Absent corrective action, some
3
UOCAVA voters from California will not be provided sufficient time to receive, mark, and submit their
4
ballots in time to have those ballots counted in the June 5, 2012 Federal primary election. Additionally,
5
the United States alleges that the State has failed to establish or implement adequate procedures that
6
ensure absentee ballots are transmitted according to the preferred method designated by the voter, as
7
required by the statute. 42 U.S.C. § 1973ff-1(f)(1)(A).
The United States and the Secretary of State (“the parties”), through their respective counsel, have
8
9
conferred and agree that this action should be settled without the delay and expense of litigation. The
10
parties share the goal of providing UOCAVA voters with sufficient opportunity to participate in the June
11
5, 2012 Federal primary election and subsequent Federal elections. Accordingly, the parties have
12
negotiated in good faith and hereby agree to the entry of this Consent Decree as an appropriate resolution
13
of the UOCAVA violations alleged by the United States. Accordingly, the United States and the
14
Secretary of State stipulate and agree that:
15
1.
16
UOCAVA, as amended by the Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment Act, Pub. L. No. 111-84,
17
Subtitle H, §§ 575-589, 123 Stat. 2190, 2318-2335 (2009) (“MOVE Act”). UOCAVA provides that
18
absent uniformed services voters and overseas voters shall be permitted “to use absentee registration
19
procedures and to vote by absentee ballot in general, special, primary, and runoff elections for Federal
20
office.” 42 U.S.C. § 1973ff-1.
21
2.
22
and this Court has jurisdiction of this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1973ff-4 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1345 and
23
2201.
24
3.
25
ensuring that validly-requested absentee ballots are transmitted to UOCAVA voters in accordance with its
26
terms. 42 U.S.C. § 1973ff-1.
27
4.
28
The Secretary of State is California’s chief elections officer. Cal. Elec. Code § 10 (West 2012); Cal.
This action is brought by the Attorney General on behalf of the United States pursuant to
The Attorney General is authorized to enforce the provisions of UOCAVA, 42 U.S.C. § 1973ff-4,
The State of California is charged with the responsibility of complying with UOCAVA, and
Debra Bowen is sued in her official capacity as the Secretary of State of the State of California.
Consent Decree
2
1
Gov’t Code § 12172.5 (West 2012). The Secretary of State is, among other things, charged with
2
administering the provisions of the Elections Code and ensuring that elections are efficiently conducted.
3
Cal. Gov’t Code § 12172.5.
4
5.
5
official who is either independently elected or hired by an independently elected Board of Supervisors.
6
6.
7
UOCAVA voters not later than 45 days before an election for Federal office when the request is received
8
at least 45 days before the election, unless a hardship exemption is obtained pursuant to Section 102(g) of
9
UOCAVA, 42 U.S.C. § 1973ff-1(g). 42 U.S.C. § 1973ff-1(a)(8). California did not seek or obtain a
The Secretary of State represents that each of California's 58 counties has its own chief elections
Section 102(a)(8) of UOCAVA requires that States transmit validly requested ballots to
10
hardship exemption for the June 5, 2012 Federal primary election.
11
7.
12
electronically in accordance with the preferred method of transmission designated by the UOCAVA voter
13
in Federal elections. 42 U.S.C. § 1973ff-1(f)(1)(A).
14
8.
15
designate whether the voter prefers that such blank absentee ballot be transmitted by mail or
16
electronically. 42 U.S.C. § 1973ff-1(f)(1)(B).
17
9.
On June 5, 2012, the State will conduct a Federal primary election.
18
10.
Counties of the State received timely requests for absentee ballots on or before the 45th day prior
19
to the June 5, 2012 Federal primary election from voters who are entitled to vote pursuant to the
20
provisions of UOCAVA.
21
11.
22
least 45 days before the June 5, 2012 Federal primary election was April 21, 2012.
23
12.
24
local elections officials by the close of polls on Election Day to be counted in the election. Cal. Elec.
25
Code §§ 3017, 3311 (West 2012). For the June 5, 2012 Federal primary election, the UOCAVA ballots
26
must be received by 8:00 p.m. on June 5, 2012.
27
13.
28
counties that failed to send all of their UOCAVA ballots by the deadline of April 21, 2012 – 45 days
UOCAVA requires that States establish procedures to transmit blank absentee ballots by mail and
UOCAVA also provides that each state shall establish procedures by which UOCAVA voters can
The deadline for transmission of absentee ballots to UOCAVA voters who had requested them at
State law requires that ballots from all voters, including UOCAVA voters, must be received by
The California Secretary of State’s office has provided information to the United States regarding
Consent Decree
3
1
before the June 5, 2012 Federal primary election.
2
14.
3
Modoc, San Diego, San Francisco, San Mateo, Shasta, Sierra, Tehama, Trinity, and Ventura) failed to
4
transmit ballots by the 45-day deadline of April 21, 2012, to some or all UOCAVA voters who had
5
requested ballots by that date. The number of UOCAVA ballots transmitted late in each county ranges
6
from one to 5,565. In all, California transmitted a total of 8,249 ballots after the 45-day deadline. After
7
the deadline, eight of the 11 late-transmitting counties (Contra Costa, Modoc, San Diego, San Francisco,
8
San Mateo, Sierra, Trinity, and Ventura) took some remedial steps by sending or resending some or all of
9
their UOCAVA ballots by express mail, and three of the 11 counties (Contra Costa, San Diego, and
According to the Secretary of State’s reports, 11 of California’s 58 counties (Contra Costa, Fresno,
10
Ventura) also offered their voters the option to return their ballot by Federal Express at county expense.
11
15.
12
two days after the deadline. A total of 5,456 ballots were transmitted by Fresno, San Francisco, and
13
Shasta Counties by the 43rd day before the June 5, 2012 Federal Primary Election. 517 ballots were
14
transmitted by Modoc, Sierra, San Francisco, Tehama, and Ventura Counties by the 41st day. 739 ballots
15
were transmitted by San Mateo County on the 39th day. Forty-one ballots were transmitted after the 39th
16
day before the June 5, 2012 Federal Primary Election (Trinity with 28 and San Diego with 13). Contra
17
Costa initially sent 1,496 ballots via email on the 43rd and 42nd day before the June 5, 2012 Federal
18
Primary Election to all voters for whom they had an email address, but later re-transmitted all its ballots
19
according to the voters’ preferences.
20
16.
21
2012, the 45th day before the June 5, 2012 Federal primary election, constitutes a violation of Section
22
102(a)(8)(A) of UOCAVA, 42 U.S.C. § 1973ff-1(a)(8)(A).
23
17.
24
electronically in accordance with the preferred method of transmission designated by the voter constitutes
25
a violation of Section 102(f)(1)(A) of UOCAVA, 42 U.S.C. § 1973ff-1(f)(1)(A). For the June 5, 2012
26
Federal primary election, Contra Costa County election officials transmitted ballots electronically to all
27
UOCAVA voters for whom they had an e-mail address, regardless of the method of delivery requested by
28
the voter. Although the county later transmitted ballots according to the voters’ preferences, that
Of the 8,249 ballots transmitted after the 45-day deadline, the majority were transmitted within
The failure to transmit absentee ballots to UOCAVA voters who requested them by April 21,
The failure to establish or implement adequate procedures to transmit absentee ballots by mail and
Consent Decree
4
1
transmission occurred after the 45-day deadline had passed. Further, information provided to the United
2
States by the Secretary of State’s office shows that at least 11 counties (including Butte, Contra Costa,
3
Fresno, Imperial, Kern, Kings, Modoc, Nevada, Siskiyou, Sonoma, and Yuba) have a stated practice that
4
fails to ensure that a UOCAVA voter’s preferred method for receiving a blank absentee ballot is honored.
5
Officials in Kern, Kings, and Nevada counties admit that they have no systematic way to track the method
6
of transmission designated by the voter and consequently these counties are unable to confirm whether the
7
application of their stated practice resulted in all UOCAVA voters receiving ballots by the method they
8
chose.
9
18.
The Secretary of State’s office confirmed with Butte Fresno, Imperial, Modoc, Siskiyou, Sonoma,
10
and Yuba counties that these counties did in fact transmit their UOCAVA ballots via the voter’s preferred
11
method.
12
19.
13
transmitted according to the preferred method designated by the voter constitutes a violation of Section
14
102(f)(1)(A) of UOCAVA, 42 U.S.C. § 1973ff-1(f)(1)(A).
15
20.
16
expeditiously promote the parties’ shared goal of ensuring that California’s UOCAVA voters will have
17
sufficient opportunity to receive absentee ballots they have requested and submit marked absentee ballots
18
in time for them to count for the June 5, 2012 Federal primary election, the parties agree that this Court
19
should enter an order that certain counties that transmitted UOCAVA ballots late shall, at no expense to
20
UOCAVA voters, provide for express mail service for the return of completed ballots by affected
21
UOCAVA voters. This remedy takes into account the extent to which some of the 11 counties have
22
remediated to a sufficient degree their late transmission through express delivery or electronic
23
transmission of the ballots and requires that four additional counties (San Francisco, San Mateo, Shasta,
24
and Trinity) offer an express delivery return option to all of its UOCAVA voters whose ballots were
25
transmitted late. The parties also agree that the Secretary of State shall establish for implementation by
26
the counties adequate procedures to ensure that the counties transmit absentee ballots by mail and
27
electronically in accordance with the preferred method of transmission designated by UOCAVA voters.
The failure to establish or implement adequate procedures that ensure that absentee ballots are
In order to avoid the burdens, delays, and uncertainties of litigation and to efficiently and
28
Consent Decree
5
1
WHEREFORE, the parties having freely given their consent, and the terms of the Decree being fair,
2
reasonable, and consistent with the requirements of UOCAVA, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED,
3
AND DECREED that:
4
(1)
The Secretary of State shall issue a directive instructing the elections officials in the
5
counties of San Francisco, San Mateo, Shasta, and Trinity, at no expense to UOCAVA
6
voters, to provide an option for express delivery service for the return of marked ballots for
7
all affected UOCAVA voters registered to vote in their counties through the courier
8
company or delivery service most suitable and accessible to those voters. The Secretary of
9
State shall issue a directive instructing the elections officials to email all affected
10
UOCAVA voters for whom the counties have an email address to notify them that if they
11
have not yet received their ballots, they may choose to receive their ballots for the June 5,
12
2012 Federal primary election by fax or email, instead of by postal mail, advise them of
13
the options for returning the voted ballot by fax, and offer the voters the option to return
14
the voted ballot by express delivery at no expense to UOCAVA voters. If the counties lack
15
email addresses for affected voters, but do have fax numbers for such voters, the
16
notification required by this paragraph shall be provided by fax. If the counties lack an
17
email address or a fax number for affected voters, but do have a telephone number for such
18
voters, the notification required by this paragraph shall be provided by telephone. The
19
notice shall, at minimum: (a) explain that the deadline for the ballot to be executed and
20
received by the county elections official is June 5, 2012 at 8:00 p.m.; (b) explain that the
21
county will provide, at no expense to UOCAVA voters, for express delivery service for the
22
return of marked ballots; (c) provide appropriate contact information at the Secretary of
23
State’s office for assistance.
24
(2)
25
Contra Costa, Fresno, Modoc, San Diego, Sierra, Tehama, and Ventura counties, to email
26
any voter who was mailed a ballot late by postal mail, who has not already been emailed or
27
sent a second ballot by express delivery, and for whom the counties have an email address
28
to notify those voters that if they have not yet received their ballots, they may choose to
Consent Decree
The Secretary of State shall issue a directive instructing the elections officials in
6
1
receive their ballots for the June 5, 2012 Federal primary election by fax or email, instead
2
of by postal mail, advise them of the options for returning the ballot by fax, and offer the
3
voters the option to return the voted ballot by express delivery, at no expense to UOCAVA
4
voters. If the counties lack an email address for affected voters, but do have fax numbers
5
for such voters, the notification required by this paragraph shall be provided by fax. The
6
notice shall, at minimum: (a) explain that the deadline for the ballot to be executed and
7
received by the county elections official is June 5, 2012 at 8:00 p.m.; (b) explain that the
8
county will provide, at no expense to UOCAVA voters, for express delivery service for the
9
return of marked ballots; (c) explain the rules for counting the ballots referenced in
10
paragraph (5); and (d) provide appropriate contact information at the Secretary of State’s
11
office for assistance.
12
(3)
13
validly counted, the Secretary of State shall establish a procedure providing which ballot
14
shall be counted if both ballots are returned, and instruct the chief elections official in each
15
county to notify all other elections officials and UOCAVA voters affected by this Order of
16
these rules.
17
(4)
18
of the Federal Voting Assistance Program of the United States Department of Defense
19
(“FVAP”) and request assistance in notifying military and other eligible voters of the relief
20
afforded by this agreement, and coordinate with FVAP as necessary to facilitate such
21
notice.
22
(5)
23
following steps to endeavor to give affected voters notice of the contents of this agreement:
24
issue a press statement for immediate release, posted immediately on the State’s election
25
information website, and distributed as broadly and immediately as practicable to national
26
and local wire services, to radio and television broadcast stations, and to daily newspapers
27
of general circulation in the State. The release shall also be distributed to the Federal
28
Voting Assistance Program; International Herald Tribune (http://www.iht.com); USA
Consent Decree
To ensure that UOCAVA voters who received two ballots will have their ballot
Upon entry of this Consent Decree, the Secretary of State shall notify the Director
Upon the entry of this Consent Decree, the Secretary of State shall take the
7
1
Today International (http://www.usatoday.com); Military Times Media Group
2
(cvinch@militarytimes.com); Overseas Vote Foundation
3
(http://www.overseasvotefoundation.org/intro/); Stars and Stripes (www.estripes.com), and
4
any other appropriate news media in the State of California. The news release shall, at
5
minimum: (a) summarize this order, including a description that the option of express
6
return of marked ballots has been offered in certain counties within the State; (b) notify
7
affected UOCAVA voters that they may choose to receive their ballots for the June 5, 2012
8
Federal primary election by fax or email and return them by fax or express delivery as
9
provided by this order; and (c) provide appropriate contact information at the Secretary of
10
State’s office. The Secretary of State shall also prepare and distribute written public
11
service announcements describing this Consent Decree for broadcast on radio and
12
television networks, including but not limited to the media described above.
13
(6)
14
shall provide a report to counsel of record for the United States no later than July 13, 2012,
15
concerning the number of UOCAVA absentee ballots, by county, received and counted for
16
the June 5, 2012 Federal primary election. The report will set forth the following
17
information, by county, categorized by absent uniformed services voters with APO/FPO
18
addresses or non- U.S. street addresses; uniformed services voters at a street address within
19
the U.S.; and overseas civilian voters:
For each county that transmitted its UOCAVA ballots late, the Secretary of State
20
a.
The number of absentee ballots from UOCAVA voters received by the
21
affected counties by 8:00 p.m. on June 5, 2012, and counted;
22
b.
23
8:00 p.m. on June 5, 2012 for all of the affected counties; and
24
c.
25
counted in the June 5, 2012 Federal primary election in the affected counties, for
26
reasons other than late receipt, and the reasons such ballots were not counted.
The number of absentee ballots from UOCAVA voters received later than
The number of absentee ballots from UOCAVA voters that were not
27
(7)
28
adequate procedures to ensure that the counties transmit absentee ballots by mail and
Consent Decree
The Secretary of State shall establish for implementation by all 58 counties
8
1
electronically in accordance with the preferred method of transmission designated by
2
UOCAVA voters in all future Federal elections. The Secretary of State shall ensure that
3
any forms, instructions, and materials used by the Secretary of State or provided by the
4
Secretary of State to the State's counties reflect absentee ballot transmission procedures
5
consistent with UOCAVA.
6
(8)
7
August 1, 2012, the Secretary of State shall conduct a training program for at least one
8
elections official who is responsible for UOCAVA implementation in each California
9
county on the requirements of UOCAVA, as amended by the MOVE Act, and the need to
In anticipation of the November 6, 2012 Federal general election, no later than
10
send absentee ballots on time and by the voters’ requested method of transmission.
11
Training materials shall be developed in consultation with and approved by counsel for the
12
United States.
13
(9)
14
future Federal elections conducted prior to the expiration of this decree, the Secretary of
15
State shall gather the following information and report it to counsel of record for the
16
United States:
To ensure California’s compliance with UOCAVA for the remaining 2012 and all
17
a.
18
California county to determine: (1) whether each county has received a sufficient
19
number of printed absentee ballots sufficiently ahead of the 45-day mailing
20
deadline to transmit those ballots as required by UOCAVA; (2) whether each
21
county has the technical capacity to transmit all requested ballots by the requested
22
method of transmission; (3) whether any county anticipates difficulties or a
23
situation that would prevent it from transmitting all requested ballots to UOCAVA
24
voters by the requested method of transmission and by the appropriate deadline; (4)
25
what measures any such county will implement to address any difficulties or
26
obstacles to transmitting all requested ballots to UOCAVA voters by the requested
27
method and by the appropriate deadline; and (5) whether any county believes it
28
needs additional support to ensure that it meets the appropriate deadlines. Where
Consent Decree
Beginning the 55th day prior to each Federal election, survey each
9
1
additional support to the counties is appropriate, the Secretary of State shall provide
2
it. The Secretary of State shall provide the results of the survey to counsel for the
3
United States in a format agreed to by the parties no later than 5:00 p.m. Pacific
4
time on the 48th day before each Federal election.
5
b.
6
officials written or electronic certifications, in a format agreed to by the parties, of:
7
(1) the number of absentee ballot applications received by each county on or before
8
the 45th day before each Federal election from any voter entitled to vote pursuant
9
to UOCAVA and the method of transmission requested; (2) the date on which the
10
county began sending absentee ballots to those UOCAVA voters; (3) the date on
11
which and method of transmission by which the county completed sending those
12
absentee ballots; and (4) an affirmative declaration that all UOCAVA ballots
13
requested by the 45th day were transmitted by the 45th day by the requested
14
method of transmission;
15
c.
16
above into a spreadsheet format devised in consultation with the United States and
17
transmit the spreadsheet electronically to counsel for the United States no later than
18
5:00 p.m. Pacific time on the 42nd day before each Federal election;
19
d.
20
reported pursuant to paragraph (10)(b) of this Decree is accurate to the best of the
21
Secretary of State’s knowledge;
22
e.
23
a format agreed to by the parties, of: (1) the number of absentee ballot applications
24
received by each county after the 45th day and on or before the 30th day before
25
each Federal election from any voter entitled to vote pursuant to UOCAVA and the
26
method of transmission requested; and (2) the date on which and method of
27
transmission by which the county sent the requested ballots; and (3) an affirmative
28
declaration that all UOCAVA ballots requested after the 45th day and on or before
Consent Decree
By the 43rd day prior to each Federal election, obtain from county elections
Compile the data provided by the counties described in paragraph (10)(b)
Certify in writing to counsel for the United States that all of the data
Obtain written or electronic certifications from county elections officials, in
10
1
the 30th day were transmitted promptly by the requested method of transmission;
2
f.
3
above into a spreadsheet format devised in consultation with the United States and
4
transmit the spreadsheet electronically to counsel for the United States no later than
5
5:00 p.m. Pacific time on the 29th day before each Federal election; and
6
g.
7
reported pursuant to paragraph (10)(e) of this Decree is accurate to the best of the
8
Secretary of State’s knowledge.
(10)
9
Compile the data provided by the counties described in paragraph (10)(e)
Certify in writing to counsel for the United States that all of the data
The Secretary of State shall maintain written records of all actions taken pursuant
10
to this Consent Decree sufficient to document compliance with its terms. Such records
11
shall be made available to the United States upon request.
12
(11)
13
procedures to ensure that all counties fully implement UOCAVA so that voters shall have
14
the full opportunity to vote guaranteed by UOCAVA in future Federal elections, including
15
determining the cause of the late mailed ballots and taking any necessary actions to prevent
16
future violations arising from the State’s election calendar or practices of the Secretary of
17
State or California’s counties. The parties shall confer on the progress of these efforts, and
18
the Secretary of State shall provide status reports to the United States by December 1,
19
2012; December 1, 2013; and December 1, 2014.
The Secretary of State shall establish for implementation by all 58 counties
20
The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action to enter such further relief as may be necessary for the
21
effectuation of the terms of this Consent Decree and to ensure compliance with UOCAVA through
22
December 31, 2014. For good cause shown, any party may move to extend the consent decree or to
23
reopen the case.
24
25
26
27
28
Consent Decree
11
1
AGREED AND CONSENTED TO this 25th day of May, 2012.
2
For the Plaintiff:
3
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Assistant Attorney General
Civil Rights Division
4
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
/s/ Jaye Allison Sitton
T. CHRISTIAN HERREN, JR.
ABEL GOMEZ
JAYE ALLISON SITTON (D.C. Bar # 453655)
OLIMPIA E. MICHEL (N.Y. Bar # 4358321)
Attorneys, Voting Section
Civil Rights Division
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
NWB 7254
Washington, D.C. 20530
Telephone: (202) 305-4143
Facsimile: (202) 307-3961
13
14
15
For Defendant Secretary of State:
KAMALA HARRIS
California Attorney General
16
17
18
19
20
21
/s/ George Waters (as authorized on May 25, 2012)
GEORGE WATERS (Cal. Bar # 88295)
Deputy Attorney General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 94244-2550
Sacramento, CA 94244
Telephone: (916) 323-8050
Facsimile: (916) 324-8835
22
23
SO ORDERED this 29th day of May, 2012.
24
25
26
27
28
Consent Decree
12
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?