Malibu Media, LLC v. Unknown

Filing 8

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/21/12 ORDERING the plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than 10/1/12 why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to file a timely status report. Status Conference is reset for 10/15/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. Status report shall be filed no later than 14 days prior to status conference. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, a California limited liability company, 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 JOHN DOE 1, 12 Defendant.* ________________________________ 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:12-cv-01459-GEB-EFB ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE 14 The May 30, 2012 Order Setting Status (Pretrial Scheduling) 15 Conference scheduled a status conference in this case on October 1, 16 2012, and required the parties to file a joint status report no later 17 than fourteen (14) days prior to the scheduling conference. The May 30, 18 2012 Order further required that a status report be filed regardless of 19 whether a joint report could be procured. No status report was filed as 20 ordered. 21 Therefore, Plaintiff is Ordered to Show Cause (“OSC”) in a 22 writing to be filed no later than October 1, 2012, why sanctions should 23 not be imposed against it and/or its counsel under Rule 16(f) of the 24 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to file a timely status 25 report. The written response shall also state whether Plaintiff or its 26 27 28 * The caption has been amended according to the dismissal of Defendants John Does 2-7. See ECF No. 7. 1 1 counsel is at fault, and whether a hearing is requested on the OSC.1 If 2 a hearing is requested, it will be held on October 15, 2012, at 9:00 3 a.m., just prior to the status conference, which is rescheduled to that 4 date and time. A status report shall be filed no later than fourteen 5 (14) days prior to the status conference. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 21, 2012 8 9 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. Senior United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 “If the fault lies with the attorney, that is where the impact of sanction should be lodged. If the fault lies with the clients, that is where the impact of the sanction should be lodged.” Matter of Sanction of Baker, 744 F.2d 1438, 1442 (10th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1014 (1985). Sometimes the faults of attorneys, and their consequences, are visited upon clients. In re Hill, 775 F.2d 1385, 1387 (9th Cir. 1985). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?