Rood v. Swarthout

Filing 30

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/6/14 ORDERING that petitioner shall show cause in writing within thirty days from the date of this order why the court should not lift the stay of these proceedings and permit the case to proceed on the only exhausted claim raised in petitioners habeas corpus application.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 RICHARD VINCENT ROOD, 11 12 13 14 No. 2:12-cv-01476 AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE GARY SWARTHOUT, Respondent. 15 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis on his petition for a 17 writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The parties have consented to the 18 jurisdiction of the undersigned. ECF Nos. 7, 13. 19 On June 13, 2013 this court granted petitioner’s motion for a stay of the instant habeas 20 proceedings in order to exhaust two additional claims for relief in state court. ECF No. 29. 21 Petitioner was ordered to file a request to lift the stay within thirty days of a decision by the 22 California Supreme Court concluding state habeas review. To date, petitioner has not filed any 23 request to lift the stay and a review of the California Supreme Court’s online case information 24 system indicates that petitioner has not filed any state habeas corpus petition challenging his 2010 25 conviction from the Shasta County Superior Court. See http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/ 26 (searchable by petitioner’s name). 27 28 Based on petitioner’s lack of action in prosecuting this case, the court will require petitioner to show cause within twenty-one days from the date of this order why the stay of the 1 1 instant case should not be lifted in order to proceed with the only exhausted claim raised in 2 petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging the trial court’s failure to dismiss at least one 3 prior strike. See ECF No. 1 at 6. 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner shall show cause in writing 5 within thirty days from the date of this order why the court should not lift the stay of these 6 proceedings and permit the case to proceed on the only exhausted claim raised in petitioner’s 7 habeas corpus application. 8 DATED: June 6, 2014 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?