Tompkins v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 43

STIPULATION and ORDER 42 for additional interrogatories pursuant to Fed. Rule of Civ. Proc 29 signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 8/8/2014. A total of 60 interrogatories will be allotted to each party throughout the course of Discovery. Parties shall assess whether additional Discovery is necessary as matter progresses. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
(SPACE BELOW FOR FILING STAMP ONLY) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STEPHANIE L. QUINN (SBN 216655) MARIEL COVARRUBIAS (SBN 274784) MURPHY, CAMPBELL, ALLISTON & QUINN 8801 Folsom Boulevard, Suite 230 Sacramento, CA 95826 Telephone: (916) 400-2300 Fax: (916) 400-2311 Email: squinn@murphycampbell.com mcovarrubias@murphycampbell.com Attorneys for Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO 9 10 MURPHY, CAMPBELL, ALLISTON & QUINN 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 Case No. 2:12-CV-01481-JAM-GGH BURLEY D. TOMPKINS, STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES FOR ADDITIONAL INTERROGATORIES PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, RULE 29 AND [PROPOSED] ORDER vs. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation, Defendants. 15 16 17 STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES FOR ADDITIONAL INTERROGATORIES 18 Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY (UPRR) and Plaintiff BURLEY 19 D. TOMPKINS (“Plaintiff”) herein collectively referred to as the parties, by and through their 20 attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to extend the discovery limitation pursuant to Rule 29 21 of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure. Due to the various claims of Plaintiff and the multiple 22 incidents at issue which span a time period of over sixteen years, the parties stipulate that a 23 total of sixty (60) interrogatories will be allotted to each party throughout the course of 24 discovery. The parties will assess whether additional discovery is necessary as the matter 25 progresses. 26 // 27 // 28 // -1STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES FOR ADDITIONAL INTERROGATORIES DATED: July 24, 2014 MURPHY, CAMPBELL, ALLISTON & QUINN 1 2 By: 3 4 5 /s/ MARIEL COVARRUBIAS STEPHANIE L. QUINN SBN 216655 MARIELCOVARRUBIAS SBN 274784 Attorney for Defendant UNION RAILROAD COMPANY PACIFIC 6 7 8 DATED: July 24, 2014 HILDEBRAND, McLEOD & NELSON, INC. 9 10 By: MURPHY, CAMPBELL, ALLISTON & QUINN 11 12 /s/ RYAN J. OTIS ANTHONY S. PETRU SBN 91399 RYAN J. OTIS SBN 260032 Attorney for Plaintiff BURLEY D. TOMPKINS 13 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED: 16 17 Dated: August 8, 2014 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES FOR ADDITIONAL INTERROGATORIES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?