Tompkins v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 64

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/28/15 ORDERING the scheduling order is hereby amended to require separate pre-trial statements be filed pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 281.(Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

BURLEY D. TOMPKINS,

11
12
13

No. 2:12-CV-1481-CMK

Plaintiff,
vs.

ORDER

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
COMPANY,

14
Defendant.
15
/
16
17

Plaintiff brings this civil action under the Federal Employers Liability Act, 45

18

U.S.C. §§ 51, et seq. It has come to the court’s attention that the July 3, 2014, scheduling order

19

does not specify whether the parties shall file a joint pre-trial statement or separate pre-trial

20

statements. Accordingly, the scheduling order is hereby amended to require separate pre-trial

21

statements be filed pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 281.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25

DATED: May 28, 2015
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
1