Harris v. Uribe
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/24/13 ordering attorney Emry J. Allen is substituted as attorney for petitioner in place of attorney William L. Schmidt. (Plummer, M) Modified on 5/28/2013 (Plummer, M).
1
2
3
4
5
William L. Schmidt, Esq. SBN 206870
William L. Schmidt, Attorney At Law, P.C.
377 W. Fallbrook Avenue, Suite 205
Fresno, CA 93711
Telephone: 559.261.2222
Facsimile: 559.436.8163
Email: bschmidt@ncinternet.net
Attorney for Plaintiff
WAYDE HOLLIS HARRIS
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
WAYDE HOLLIS HARRIS,
10
Plaintiff,
11
Case No.: 2:12-cv-01502-AC
v.
NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF
ATTORNEY [PROPOSED]
12
DOMINGO URIBE, JR.,
13
Defendant.
14
15
16
TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD HEREIN:
17
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, Wayde Hollis Harris substitutes Emry J. Allen, as counsel of
18
record in place of William L. Schmidt
19
Contact information for new counsel is as follows:
20
Emry J. Allen
Attorney at Law
5050 Laguna Blvd., Ste 112-336
Elk Grove, CA 95758
21
22
23
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
1
NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY [PROPOSED]
Case No.: 2:12-CV-01502
1
2
I, Wayde Hollis Harris, Plaintiff in the above-captioned action hereby acknowledge and consent
to the above substitution.
3
4
Date: 5/20/13
/s/Wayde Hollis Harris
Wayde Hollis Harris
5
6
7
8
I, William L. Schmidt., consent to being substituted.
9
10
Date: 5/24/13
WILLIAM L. SCHMIDT, ATTORNEY AT LAW, P.C.
11
12
/s/William L. Schmidt
William L. Schmidt
13
14
I, Emry J. Allen, consent to the above substitution.
15
16
Date: 5/20/13
EMRY J. ALLEN, ATTORNEY AT LAW
17
18
/s/Emry J. Allen
Emry J. Allen
Attorney for Plaintiff Wayde Hollis Harris
19
20
21
22
23
24
The substitution of attorney is hereby approved and so ORDERED.
Date: May 24, 213
`
ALLISON CLAIRE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
27
28
2
NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY [PROPOSED]
Case No.: 2:12-CV-01502
1
2
3
Proof of Service
The undersigned hereby declares:
I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to or interested in the within entitled cause. I am
an employee of William L. Schmidt Attorney at Law and my business address is 377 W. Fallbrook
Ave., Suite 205, Fresno, CA 93711. On the date stated below, I served a true copy of:
4
5
6
NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY [PROPOSED]
1. By electronic filing, upon all other parties who have appeared via electronic mail through
CM/ECF.
7
8
9
2. By Overnight Delivery by placing said document(s) in a sealed Overnight Delivery envelope
addressed as shown below and causing such envelope delivered by commercial carrier service
for overnight delivery to the addresses shown below.
10
11
12
13
14
3. By mail, by placing said document(s) in an envelope addressed as shown below and upon all
other parties who have appeared via electronic mail through CM/ECF. I am readily familiar
with my firm’s practice for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the
United States Postal Service, to wit, that correspondence will be deposited with the United
States Postal Service this same day in the ordinary course of business. I sealed said envelope
and placed it for collection and mailing on the date stated below to the addressee stated below,
following ordinary business practices.
15
16
17
4. By e-mail pursuant to the agreement of the parties to use e-mail transmission as the method of
service to the e-mail address listed below. The transmission of the documents was reported as
complete and without error.
18
19
20
I declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is
true and correct, and that this declaration was executed at Fresno, California on May 24, 2013.
21
22
/s/Debi Jonigian-Schmidt
23
Debi Jonigian-Schmidt
24
25
26
27
28
PROOF OF SERVICE
CASE NO.: 2:12-CV-01502
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?