Harris v. Uribe

Filing 26

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/24/13 ordering attorney Emry J. Allen is substituted as attorney for petitioner in place of attorney William L. Schmidt. (Plummer, M) Modified on 5/28/2013 (Plummer, M).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 William L. Schmidt, Esq. SBN 206870 William L. Schmidt, Attorney At Law, P.C. 377 W. Fallbrook Avenue, Suite 205 Fresno, CA 93711 Telephone: 559.261.2222 Facsimile: 559.436.8163 Email: bschmidt@ncinternet.net Attorney for Plaintiff WAYDE HOLLIS HARRIS 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 WAYDE HOLLIS HARRIS, 10 Plaintiff, 11 Case No.: 2:12-cv-01502-AC v. NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY [PROPOSED] 12 DOMINGO URIBE, JR., 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD HEREIN: 17 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, Wayde Hollis Harris substitutes Emry J. Allen, as counsel of 18 record in place of William L. Schmidt 19 Contact information for new counsel is as follows: 20 Emry J. Allen Attorney at Law 5050 Laguna Blvd., Ste 112-336 Elk Grove, CA 95758 21 22 23 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY [PROPOSED] Case No.: 2:12-CV-01502 1 2 I, Wayde Hollis Harris, Plaintiff in the above-captioned action hereby acknowledge and consent to the above substitution. 3 4 Date: 5/20/13 /s/Wayde Hollis Harris Wayde Hollis Harris 5 6 7 8 I, William L. Schmidt., consent to being substituted. 9 10 Date: 5/24/13 WILLIAM L. SCHMIDT, ATTORNEY AT LAW, P.C. 11 12 /s/William L. Schmidt William L. Schmidt 13 14 I, Emry J. Allen, consent to the above substitution. 15 16 Date: 5/20/13 EMRY J. ALLEN, ATTORNEY AT LAW 17 18 /s/Emry J. Allen Emry J. Allen Attorney for Plaintiff Wayde Hollis Harris 19 20 21 22 23 24 The substitution of attorney is hereby approved and so ORDERED. Date: May 24, 213 ` ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 2 NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY [PROPOSED] Case No.: 2:12-CV-01502 1 2 3 Proof of Service The undersigned hereby declares: I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to or interested in the within entitled cause. I am an employee of William L. Schmidt Attorney at Law and my business address is 377 W. Fallbrook Ave., Suite 205, Fresno, CA 93711. On the date stated below, I served a true copy of: 4 5 6 NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY [PROPOSED] 1. By electronic filing, upon all other parties who have appeared via electronic mail through CM/ECF. 7 8 9 2. By Overnight Delivery by placing said document(s) in a sealed Overnight Delivery envelope addressed as shown below and causing such envelope delivered by commercial carrier service for overnight delivery to the addresses shown below. 10 11 12 13 14 3. By mail, by placing said document(s) in an envelope addressed as shown below and upon all other parties who have appeared via electronic mail through CM/ECF. I am readily familiar with my firm’s practice for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service, to wit, that correspondence will be deposited with the United States Postal Service this same day in the ordinary course of business. I sealed said envelope and placed it for collection and mailing on the date stated below to the addressee stated below, following ordinary business practices. 15 16 17 4. By e-mail pursuant to the agreement of the parties to use e-mail transmission as the method of service to the e-mail address listed below. The transmission of the documents was reported as complete and without error. 18 19 20 I declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct, and that this declaration was executed at Fresno, California on May 24, 2013. 21 22 /s/Debi Jonigian-Schmidt 23 Debi Jonigian-Schmidt 24 25 26 27 28 PROOF OF SERVICE CASE NO.: 2:12-CV-01502 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?