Ware v. McDonald et al

Filing 49

ORDER ADOPTING 43 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/19/2013. Plaintiff's 1st and 14th Amendment claims are DISMISSED. This action proceed on 8th Amendment and state law claims. Within 30 days from date of Order, plaintiff shall complete Notice of Submission of Documents and submit documents provided with 9/3/2013 43 Order. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARTIN WARE, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:12-cv-1505 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER M. McDONALD, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On September 3, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed objections to 23 the findings and recommendations. 24 It appears that plaintiff may have misunderstood the order and findings and 25 recommendations, because plaintiff states that he agrees with the court’s decision to dismiss the 26 First and Fourteenth Amendment claims, but objects to the court’s conclusions concerning 27 plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims. (ECF No. 44 at 1-2.) However, the magistrate judge found 28 plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment and state law claims were cognizable and directed plaintiff to 1 1 complete and return the forms for service of process on defendants. Thus, in order for these 2 claims to proceed, plaintiff must complete and return the forms provided with the September 3, 3 2013 order. The undersigned will provide plaintiff an extension of time in which to comply. 4 Nevertheless, in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local 5 Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 6 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 7 proper analysis. 8 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 9 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 3, 2013, are adopted in full; 10 2. Plaintiff’s First and Fourteenth Amendment claims are dismissed; 11 3. This action proceeds on plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment and state law claims; and 12 4. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the Notice of 13 Submission of Documents and submit the documents provided with the September 3, 2013 order. 14 Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this 15 action. 16 17 Dated: November 19, 2013 18 19 20 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 21 22 ware1505.804 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?