ACE Capital Ltd., et al v. ePlanning, Inc. et al

Filing 12

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/23/12: The defendants identified in this stipulation may file their response(s) to the Complaint on or before August 15, 2012. (Kaminski, H)

1

3

JEFFERY J. SWANSON (#155118)
2515 Park Marina Drive, Ste. 102
Redding, California 96001
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

4

Attorney for The Wood River Defendant-Claimants

2

5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION

10
11
12

ACE CAPITAL LIMITED, ACE CAPITAL IV CASE NO. 2:12-cv-01511-JAM-EFB
LIMITED, ACE CAPITAL V LIMITED and
BRIT UW LIMITED,
STIPULATION TO EXTEND

13

Plaintiffs,

14
15
16

DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Judge: The Honorable John A. Mendez
Courtroom: No. 6, 14th Floor

v.
ePLANNING, INC.; Eplanning SECURITIES,
INC.; ePLANNING ADVISORS, INC.; et al.,

17

Defendant-Claimants.

18
19

The Anderson Defendant-Claimants, identified in paragraphs 26 – 151 of the Complaint

20

herein, by and through their counsel of record, Richard S. Miller, Esq. from the Law Offices of

21

Richard S. Miller;

22

The Jamison Defendant-Claimants, identified in paragraphs 153 – 198 of the Complaint

23

herein, and Arthur Kransberger (Complaint paragraph 399), by and through their counsel of

24

record, Val Hornstein, Esq. from the Hornstein Law Offices;

25

The Nowacki Defendant-Claimants, identified in paragraphs 200 – 211 of the Complaint

26

herein, by and through their counsel of record, Patrick L. Deedon, Esq. from Maire & Burgess;

27

///

28

///
1
____________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

1

The Oakdale Heights Defendant-Claimants, identified in paragraphs 213 – 259 of the

2

Complaint herein, by and through their counsel of record, Patrick L. Deedon, Esq. from Maire &

3

Burgess;

4

The Roseville Defendant-Claimants, identified in paragraphs 261 – 292 of the Complaint

5

herein, by and through their counsel of record, Troy A. Thielemann, Esq. from Capello & Noel

6

LLP;

7

The Wood River Defendant-Claimants, identified in paragraphs 294 – 366 of the

8

Complaint herein, by and through their counsel of record, Jeffery J. Swanson, Esq. from the Law

9

Offices of Jeffery J. Swanson;

10

The Alvarado Defendant-Claimants, identified in paragraphs 368 – 369 of the Complaint

11

herein, by and through their counsel of record, Jeffrey A. Feldman, Esq. from the Law Offices of

12

Jeffrey A. Feldman;

13

The Ambrosio Defendant-Claimants, identified in paragraphs 371 - 392 of the Complaint

14

herein, by and through their counsel of record, George Donaldson, Esq. from the Law Office of

15

George Donaldson;
Terri Stupar and Patti Bergstrom, Defendant-Claimants, by and through their counsel of

16
17

record, Philip J. Terry, Esq., from Carle, Mackie, Power & Ross LLP;
Sue Pricco and Paul Freese, Defendant-Claimants, by and through their counsel of record,

18
19

David L. Edwards, Esq.;

20

Roxanne Davis Jones, Individually and as Trustee of the Roxanne Davis Jones 2001

21

Revocable Family Trust, Defendant-Claimant, in pro per;

22

Sally Weber, Defendant-Claimant, in pro per; and

23

Plaintiffs Ace Capital Limited, Ace Capital IV Limited, Ace Capital V Limited, and Brit

24

UW Limited, by and through their counsel of record, Michael L. Fox, Esq. of Sedgwick LLP,

25

hereby stipulate, subject to the Court’s approval, that the defendants identified above may file

26

their response(s) to the Complaint on or before August 15, 2012.

27

///

28

///
2
____________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

2
3

DATED: July 23, 2012

By: /s/ Michael L. Fox
Michael L. Fox
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

4
5
6

SEDGWICK LLP

DATED: July 23, 2012

Law Offices of Richard S. Miller

7
By: /s/ Richard S. Miller
Richard S. Miller
Attorney for The Anderson Defendant-Claimants

8
9
10

DATED: July 23, 2012

11

By: /s/ Val Hornstein
Val Hornstein
Attorney for The Jamison Defendant-Claimants
and Arthur Kransberger

12
13
14

Hornstein Law Offices

DATED: July 23, 2012

Maire & Burgess

15
By: /s/ Patrick L. Deedon
Patrick L. Deedon
Attorney for The Nowacki Defendant-Claimants

16
17
18

DATED: July 23, 2012

19

By: /s/ Patrick L. Deedon
Patrick L. Deedon
Attorney for The Oakdale Heights DefendantClaimants

20
21
22

Maire & Burgess

DATED: July 23, 2012

Cappello & Noel LLP

23
By: /s/ Troy A. Thielemann
Troy A. Thielemann
Attorney for The Roseville Defendant-Claimants

24
25
26
27
28

DATED: July 23, 2012

Law Offices of Jeffery J. Swanson
By: /s/ Jeffery J. Swanson
Jeffery J. Swanson
Attorney for The Wood River Defendant-Claimants

3
____________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

1
2

DATED: July 23, 2012

By: /s/ Jeffrey A. Feldman
Jeffrey A. Feldman
Attorney for The Alvarado Defendant-Claimants

3
4
5

Law Offices of Jeffrey A. Feldman

DATED: July 23, 2012

Law Office of George Donaldson

6
By: /s/ George Donaldson
George Donaldson
Attorney for The Ambrosio Defendant-Claimants

7
8
9

DATED: July 23, 2012

10

By: /s/ Philip J. Terry
Philip J. Terry
Attorney for Defendant-Claimants Terri Stupar and
Patty Bergstrom

11
12
13

Carle, Mackie, Power & Ross LLP

DATED: July 23, 2012

Law Offices of David L. Edwards

14
By: /s/ David L. Edwards
David L. Edwards
Attorney for Defendant-Claimants Sue Pricco and
Paul Freese

15
16
17
18

DATED: July 23, 2012

19
20
21

Roxanne Davis Jones, Individually and as Trustee of
the Roxanne Davis Jones 2001 Revocable Family
Trust, in pro per
By: /s/ Roxanne Davis Jones

DATED: July 23, 2012

Sally Weber, in pro per

22
By: /s/ Sally Weber

23
24
25

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27

DATED: 7/23/2012

/s/ John A. Mendez____________
United States District Court Judge

28
4
____________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

1

Certification Pursuant to General Order No. 45(X)(B)

2
I, Jeffery J. Swanson, certify that concurrence in the filing of the attached Joint Stipulation

3
4

to Extend Defendants’ Deadline to Respond to Complaint has been obtained from each signatory

5

listed.

6
7

Dated: July 23, 2012

8
9
10
11

/s/ Jeffery J. Swanson
JEFFERY J. SWANSON
Attorney for The Wood River DefendantClaimants.

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
____________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com