ACE Capital Ltd., et al v. ePlanning, Inc. et al

Filing 79

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/31/2012. re: 78 Stipulation and Proposed Order. The Underwriters may file their responsive pleading to the 52 Counterclaim filed by Wood River on or before 10/4/2012. (Waggoner, D)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 SEDGWICK LLP RALPH A. GUIRGIS Bar No. 143262 MICHAEL L. FOX Bar No. 173355 ROBERT S. GEBHARD Bar No. 158125 JIM S. BYUN Bar No. 199966 JAMISON R. NARBAITZ Bar No. 219339 333 Bush Street, 30th Floor San Francisco, California 94104-2834 Telephone: (415) 781-7900 Facsimile: (415) 781-2635 ralph.guirgis@sedgwicklaw.com michael.fox@sedgwicklaw.com robert.gebhard@sedgwicklaw.com jamison.narbaitz@sedgwicklaw.com jim.byun@sedgwicklaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs ACE CAPITAL LIMITED, ACE CAPITAL IV LIMITED, ACE CAPITAL V LIMITED and BRIT UW LIMITED 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 14 15 ACE CAPITAL LIMITED, et al., CASE NO. 2:12-cv-1511-JAM-EFB 16 17 18 Plaintiffs, v. 19 20 21 ePLANNING, INC., et al., STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR ACE CAPITAL LIMITED, ACE CAPITAL IV LIMITED, ACE CAPITAL V LIMITED, AND BRIT UW LIMITED TO RESPOND TO WOOD RIVER DEFENDANTS-CLAIMANTS’ COUNTERCLAIM Defendant-Claimants. 22 23 24 Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants ACE CAPITAL LIMITED, ACE CAPITAL IV 25 LIMITED, ACE CAPITAL V LIMITED, and BRIT UW LIMITED (collectively referred to as 26 “Underwriters”), by and through their counsel of record, Jamison R. Narbaitz, Esq. of Sedgwick 27 LLP, and Defendants and Counterclaimants WOOD RIVER DEFENDANTS-CLAIMANTS (as 28 defined and identified in paragraphs 293 through 366 of the interpleader complaint (ECF No. 2)), SF/2919790v1 -1Case No. 2:12-cv-1511-JAM-EFB STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO WOOD RIVER DEFENDANTS-CLAIMANTS’ COUNTERCLAIM 1 by and through their counsel of record, Jeffery J. Swanson, Esq., hereby stipulate, subject to the 2 Court’s approval, that Underwriters may file their responsive pleading to the Counterclaim filed 3 by WOOD RIVER DEFENDANTS-CLAIMANTS (ECF No. 52) on or before October 4, 2012. 4 5 DATED: August 31, 2012 6 SEDGWICK LLP By: /s/ Jamison R. Narbaitz Ralph A. Guirgis Michael L. Fox Jamison R. Narbaitz Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants ACE CAPITAL LIMITED, ACE CAPITAL IV LIMITED, ACE CAPITAL V LIMITED and BRIT UW LIMITED 7 8 9 10 11 12 DATED: August 31, 2012 LAW OFFICE OF JEFFERY J. SWANSON By: /s/ Jeffery J. Swanson Jeffery J. Swanson Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants WOOD RIVER DEFENDANTS-CLAIMANTS 13 14 15 16 ORDER 17 18 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 DATED: 8/31/2012 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 21 22 Certification Pursuant to Rule 131(e) 23 I, Jamison R. Narbaitz, certify that concurrence in the filing of the foregoing Stipulation 24 has been obtained from each signatory listed. 25 26 27 /s/ Jamison R. Narbaitz Jamison R. Narbaitz 28 SF/2919790v1 -2Case No. 2:12-cv-1511-JAM-EFB STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO WOOD RIVER DEFENDANTS-CLAIMANTS’ COUNTERCLAIM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?