McElroy v. Gustafson et al
Filing
109
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/06/15 denying 107 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The court notes that plaintiff's pretrial statement, which was originally due on 7/02/15, must be filed no later than 10/22/15. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LATHAHN McELROY,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:12-cv-1518-TLN-EFB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
GUSTAFSON,
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42
18
U.S.C. § 1983. He has once again requested that the court appoint counsel. As plaintiff has been
19
previously informed, see ECF Nos. 38, 58, 82, 94, 103, district courts lack authority to require
20
counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist.
21
Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request an attorney
22
to voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v. Brewer, 935
23
F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990).
24
When determining whether “exceptional circumstances” exist, the court must consider the
25
likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro
26
se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970
27
(9th Cir. 2009). Having once again considered those factors, the court still finds there are no
28
exceptional circumstances in this case.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for appointment of
2
counsel (ECF No. 107) is denied. The court notes that plaintiff’s pretrial statement, which was
3
originally due on July 2, 2015, must be filed no later than October 22, 2015. Failure to timely file
4
a pretrial statement may result in a recommendation of dismissal
5
DATED: October 6, 2015.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?