McElroy v. Gustafson et al
Filing
116
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/4/15 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed 9/22/15, are adopted in full; and Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend (ECF No. 98 ) is denied. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LATHAHN McELROY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:12-cv-1518-TLN-EFB P
v.
ORDER
GUSTAFSON, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On September 22, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. After an extension of
23
time, Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire
26
file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
27
proper analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed September 22, 2015, are adopted in full; and
3
2. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend (ECF No. 98) is denied.
4
So ordered.
5
Dated: December 4, 2015
6
7
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?