McElroy v. Gustafson et al
Filing
33
ORDER ADOPTING 25 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/9/2013. Defendants' 13 Motion to Revoke plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is DENIED. Defendants shall answer 1 Complaint within 10 days from date of Order. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
LATHAHN MCELROY,
11
12
Plaintiff,
No. 2:12-cv-1518 TLN JFM P
vs.
13
C/O GUSTAFSON, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
ORDER
/
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
17
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
18
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On May 7, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
21
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendants have not
22
filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
23
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule
24
304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire
25
file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
26
proper analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed May 7, 2013 (ECF No. 25) are
3
adopted in full;
4
5
2. Defendants’ October 15, 2012 motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis
status (ECF No. 13) is denied; and
6
3. Defendants shall answer plaintiff’s complaint within ten days from the date of
7
this order.
8
DATED: September 9, 2013
9
10
11
12
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
/mcel1518.805
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?