McElroy v. Gustafson et al

Filing 33

ORDER ADOPTING 25 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/9/2013. Defendants' 13 Motion to Revoke plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is DENIED. Defendants shall answer 1 Complaint within 10 days from date of Order. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LATHAHN MCELROY, 11 12 Plaintiff, No. 2:12-cv-1518 TLN JFM P vs. 13 C/O GUSTAFSON, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 ORDER / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On May 7, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 21 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendants have not 22 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 24 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 25 file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 26 proper analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 7, 2013 (ECF No. 25) are 3 adopted in full; 4 5 2. Defendants’ October 15, 2012 motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status (ECF No. 13) is denied; and 6 3. Defendants shall answer plaintiff’s complaint within ten days from the date of 7 this order. 8 DATED: September 9, 2013 9 10 11 12 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge /mcel1518.805 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?