Bowen v. Cate et al
Filing
63
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/6/2015 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 62 are ADOPTED in FULL; Plaintiff's claims for prospective injunctive relief and his state claims are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to pros ecute pursuant to FRCP 41(b); Defendant Beard is DISMISSED from this action because no claims remain against him; Defendants Boparai, Carrick, Chapnick, Conanan, McAlpine, McElroy, Millner, Shadday, and Swarthout are ordered to answer the remaining claims within 30 days from the electronic filing of this order.(Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BURCH MICHAEL BOWEN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:12-cv-1519 MCE AC P
v.
ORDER
MATTHEW CATE, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On June 3, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
20
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 62. Neither party
23
has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered
26
that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed June 3, 2015 (ECF No. 62) are ADOPTED IN
27
28
FULL.
1
1
2
2. Plaintiff’s claims for prospective injunctive relief and his state claims are DISMISSED
without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
3
4
5
3. Defendant Beard is DISMISSED from this action because no claims remain against
him.
4. Defendants Boparai, Carrick, Chapnick, Conanan, McAlpine, McElroy, Millner,
6
Shadday, and Swarthout are ordered to answer the remaining claims within thirty (30) days from
7
the electronic filing of this order.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 6, 2015
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?