Bowen v. Cate et al

Filing 63

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/6/2015 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 62 are ADOPTED in FULL; Plaintiff's claims for prospective injunctive relief and his state claims are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to pros ecute pursuant to FRCP 41(b); Defendant Beard is DISMISSED from this action because no claims remain against him; Defendants Boparai, Carrick, Chapnick, Conanan, McAlpine, McElroy, Millner, Shadday, and Swarthout are ordered to answer the remaining claims within 30 days from the electronic filing of this order.(Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BURCH MICHAEL BOWEN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:12-cv-1519 MCE AC P v. ORDER MATTHEW CATE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 3, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 62. Neither party 23 has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered 26 that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 3, 2015 (ECF No. 62) are ADOPTED IN 27 28 FULL. 1 1 2 2. Plaintiff’s claims for prospective injunctive relief and his state claims are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 3 4 5 3. Defendant Beard is DISMISSED from this action because no claims remain against him. 4. Defendants Boparai, Carrick, Chapnick, Conanan, McAlpine, McElroy, Millner, 6 Shadday, and Swarthout are ordered to answer the remaining claims within thirty (30) days from 7 the electronic filing of this order. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 6, 2015 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?