Leon v. Tri Counties Bank
Filing
18
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/14/2013 ORDERING 17 Disclosure of Expert Witnesses Reset for 11/19/2013, Supplemental Disclosure 11/26/2013. Discovery due by 1/6/2014. Dispositive Motions filed by 2/19/2014, Motion hearing for 3/19/2014 at 9:30 AM. Joint Pretrial Statement due 4/25/2014. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/2/2014 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. Jury Trial set for 6/9/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez.(Reader, L)
Leon v. Tri Counties Bank
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Doc. 18
RONALD W. BROWN, ESQ. (SBN 107340)
CARRIE E. BUSHMAN, ESQ. (SBN 186130)
COOK BROWN, LLP
555 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 425
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814
TELEPHONE NO.: 916‐442‐3100
FACSIMILE NO.: 916‐442‐4227
Attorneys for Defendant TRI COUNTIES BANK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
RICHARD LEON, JR.,
Plaintiff(s),
11
12
13
14
Case No. 2:12‐CV‐01529‐JAM‐DAD
STIPULATION AND ORDER
MODIFYING PRE‐TRIAL
SCHEDULING ORDER
[FRCP 16(b)(4)]
v.
TRI COUNTIES BANK,
Defendant(s).
Action Filed: June 7, 2012
15
16
17
This Stipulation and [Proposed] Order is entered into between Plaintiff RICHARD
18
LEON, JR. and Defendant TRI COUNTIES BANK (collectively, the “Parties”), by and
19
through their counsel of record, as follows:
STIPULATION
20
21
WHEREAS, despite the Parties’ diligent efforts to schedule discovery in a timely
22
manner, scheduling conflicts have prevented the Parties from being able to take the
23
depositions of key witnesses, including Plaintiff, until late September ‐ early October, 2013;
24
and,
25
WHEREAS, the Parties believe that their inability to complete such depositions well
26
in advance of the current deadlines for making expert witness disclosures (September 20,
27
2013) and for completing all discovery (November 22, 2013), as well as other pre‐trial
28
STIPULATION TO MODIFY PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
C:\Documents and
1
Settings\HVine\Desktop\12cv1529.o.81413.docx
Dockets.Justia.com
1
deadlines, will prejudice their ability to meet those deadlines and effectively represent
2
their respective clients’ interests,
3
4
dates contained in the Pre‐trial Scheduling Order issued by the Court on September 6,
5
2013 be modified as follows:
6
Expert disclosure: 11/19/2013;
7
Supplemental disclosure: 11/26/2013;
8
Discovery cutoff: 1/6/2014;
9
Dispositive motion filing date: 2/19/2014;
10
Dispositive motion hearing date: 3/19/2014 at 9:30 a.m.;
11
Joint pretrial statement due: 4/25/2014;
12
Final pretrial conference date: 5/2/2014 at 11 a.m.;
13
Jury trial: 6/9/2014 at 9:00 a.m.
14
DATED: August 13, 2013
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Parties, that the
15
17
DATED: August 13, 2013
19
21
LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD M. ROGERS
By: __/s/ Richard M. Rogers
RICHARD M. ROGERS
Attorneys for Plaintiff
RICHARD LEON, JR.
20
22
COOK BROWN, LLP
By: ___/s/ Carrie E. Bushman
CARRIE E. BUSHMAN
Attorneys for Defendant
TRI COUNTIES BANK
16
18
ORDER
23
24
The Court, having considered the above stipulation, and finding good cause
25
pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 16(b)(4), HEREBY ORDERS THAT the
26
dates contained in the Pre‐trial Scheduling Order issued by the Court on September 6,
27
2013, be modified as follows:
28
Expert disclosure: 11/19/2013;
STIPULATION TO MODIFY PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
C:\Documents and
Settings\HVine\Desktop\12cv1529.o.81413.docx
2
1
Supplemental disclosure: 11/26/2013;
2
Discovery cutoff: 1/6/2014;
3
Dispositive motion filing date: 2/19/2014;
4
Dispositive motion hearing date: 3/19/2014 at 9:30 a.m.;
5
Joint pretrial statement due: 4/25/2014;
6
Final pretrial conference date: 5/2/2014 at 11 a.m.;
7
Jury trial: 6/9/2014 at 9:00 a.m.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
DATED: 8/14/2013
10
11
/S/ JOHN A. MENDEZ____________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO MODIFY PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
C:\Documents and
Settings\HVine\Desktop\12cv1529.o.81413.docx
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?