Leon v. Tri Counties Bank

Filing 35

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/24/2014 CONTINUING the Motion Hearing on 24 Motion for Leave to file a Second Amended Answer to 3/26/2014 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
1 RICHARD M. ROGERS, #045843 LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD M. ROGERS 2 4 100 Bush Street, #1980 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415/981-9788 Facsimile: 415/981-9798 Email: RogersRMR@yahoo.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 3 RICHARD LEON, JR. 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 RICHARD LEON, JR., Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 TRI COUNTIES BANK, Defendant. 16 17 18 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:12-CV-01529-JAM-AC Case filed: Case reassigned: Trial date: 06/07/12 11/20/12 06/09/14 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED ANSWER; [PROPOSED] ORDER_______________ Date: Time: Location: 03/05/14 9:30am Courtroom 6 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 2:12-CV-01529-JAM-AC -- STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED ANSWER; ORDER LEON /12cv1529.o.22414.docx 1 The parties hereto stipulate to continue the hearing on Defendant’s Motion For Leave To 2 File A Second Amended Answer from March 5, 2014, to March 26, 2014 at 9:30 a.m., due to a 3 calendar conflict on behalf of Plaintiff’s Counsel, Richard M. Rogers. 4 Respectfully submitted, 5 6 Dated: 2/24/2014 7 By:/s/ Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 9 LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD M. ROGERS Dated: 2/24/2014 COOK BROWN LLP 10 11 By: /s/________________________________ CARRIE E. BUSHMAN Attorneys for Defendant 12 13 14 It Is So Ordered. 15 16 Dated: 2/24/2014 17 /s/ John A. Mendez___________________ JOHN A. MENDEZ JUDGE OF THE US DISTRICT COURT 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 2:12-CV-01529-JAM-AC -- STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED ANSWER; ORDER LEON /12cv1529.o.22414.docx 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?