Leon v. Tri Counties Bank
Filing
35
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/24/2014 CONTINUING the Motion Hearing on 24 Motion for Leave to file a Second Amended Answer to 3/26/2014 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. (Michel, G)
1
RICHARD M. ROGERS, #045843
LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD M. ROGERS
2
4
100 Bush Street, #1980
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415/981-9788
Facsimile:
415/981-9798
Email:
RogersRMR@yahoo.com
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
3
RICHARD LEON, JR.
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
RICHARD LEON, JR.,
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
TRI COUNTIES BANK,
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:12-CV-01529-JAM-AC
Case filed:
Case reassigned:
Trial date:
06/07/12
11/20/12
06/09/14
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
FILE A SECOND AMENDED ANSWER;
[PROPOSED] ORDER_______________
Date:
Time:
Location:
03/05/14
9:30am
Courtroom 6
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-01529-JAM-AC -- STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED ANSWER;
ORDER
LEON
/12cv1529.o.22414.docx
1
The parties hereto stipulate to continue the hearing on Defendant’s Motion For Leave To
2
File A Second Amended Answer from March 5, 2014, to March 26, 2014 at 9:30 a.m., due to a
3
calendar conflict on behalf of Plaintiff’s Counsel, Richard M. Rogers.
4
Respectfully submitted,
5
6
Dated: 2/24/2014
7
By:/s/
Attorneys for Plaintiff
8
9
LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD M. ROGERS
Dated: 2/24/2014
COOK BROWN LLP
10
11
By: /s/________________________________
CARRIE E. BUSHMAN
Attorneys for Defendant
12
13
14
It Is So Ordered.
15
16
Dated: 2/24/2014
17
/s/ John A. Mendez___________________
JOHN A. MENDEZ
JUDGE OF THE US DISTRICT COURT
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-01529-JAM-AC -- STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED ANSWER;
ORDER
LEON
/12cv1529.o.22414.docx
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?