Brewer v. Grossbaum et al

Filing 25

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/20/12 denying 24 Motion for damages. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

KEVIN D. BREWER,

11
12
13

Plaintiff,

No. 2:12-cv-1555 DAD P

vs.
YOSSI GROSSBAUM et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

ORDER
/

16

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

17

§ 1983. On July 12, 2012, the court ordered service of plaintiff’s complaint on defendants.

18

Plaintiff has since filed a “motion for damages.” (Doc. No. 24.) It is not clear why plaintiff has

19

filed this motion or what relief he seeks from the court. However, plaintiff is advised that such a

20

motion appears to be unnecessary. If this matter ultimately goes to trial, a jury will determine

21

whether plaintiff is entitled to an award of damages which he seeks, and of so, in what amount.

22

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for damages

23

(Doc. No. 24) is denied as unnecessary.

24

DATED: August 20, 2012.

25
26

DAD:9
brew1555.mot

1