Lee et al v. Yang et al

Filing 56

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/28/2013 DENYING 44 Motion to file a second amended complaint. (Donati, J)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

Nou Lee, Bor Pha,
Plaintiffs,

9
v.

10

13

Yia Yang, Yia Yang d.b.a. Yia’s
Auto Sales, Yia Yang d.b.a.
Platinum Financial, Yia’s Auto
Sales, Inc., Great American
Insurance Company,

14

Defendants.
________________________________

11
12

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:12-cv-1580-GEB-DAD
ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO AMEND

15
16

Plaintiffs

moves

for

leave

under

Federal

Rule

of

Civil

17

Procedure (“Rule”) 15 to file a second amended complaint. However,

18

Plaintiffs have failed “to attach the document proposed to be filed as

19

an exhibit to [these] moving papers seeking such leave,” as required

20

under the local rule. E.D. Cal. R. 137(c). Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion

21

(ECF No. 44) is denied.

22

Dated:

March 28, 2013

23
24
25

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
Senior United States District Judge

26
27
28
1