Allen v. Virga et al

Filing 26

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/11/2013 DENYING plaintiff's 25 request for the appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 KEVIN ALLEN, Plaintiff, 11 12 vs. 13 No. 2:12-cv-1583 AC P T. VIRGA, et al., 14 15 16 Defendants. ORDER / Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme 17 Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent 18 prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In 19 certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel 20 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); 21 Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court 22 does not find the required exceptional circumstances. This case involves a relatively 23 straightforward claim against two defendants for a violation of plaintiff’s First Amendment right 24 to the free exercise of his religion in being denied a kosher diet. Plaintiff states that he is 25 illiterate, dyslexic and has to obtain assistance from other inmates to help him with this case. He 26 complains that he is not receiving enough assistance from the law library in obtaining legal help. 1 1 These claims do not render plaintiff’s circumstances exceptional among indigent inmates 2 proceeding pro se in civil rights actions. Moreover, there is a limited availability of pro bono 3 counsel. Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied. 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for the 5 appointment of counsel (Docket No. 25) is denied. 6 DATED: April 11, 2013. 7 8 9 10 ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AC:009/:md alle1583.31 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?