V.W. v. City of Vallejo, et al.,

Filing 12

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/11/12 ORDERING Defendant is to bring on a motion to dismiss within thirty (30) days, plaintiff shall respond within twenty-one (21)days, and defendant to reply within fifteen (15) days. A hearing on the motion is set for January 14, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.(Matson, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12

V. W., a minor, by and
through her Guardian Ad
Litem, Tenaya Barber,
Individually and as
Successor in Interest
of Decedent MICHAEL WHITE,

NO. CIV. S-12-1629 LKK/GGH

13
Plaintiffs,
14
v.
O R D E R

15
16
17
18

CITY OF VALLEJO, a municipal
corporation; ROBERT NICHELINI,
in his individual and official
capacity as Chief of Police;
Officers Does 1-25,
individually, jointly and
severally,

19
Defendants.
/

20

A status conference was held in chambers on October 9, 2012.

21
22

After hearing, the court orders as follows:
The defendant claims that the discharge in bankruptcy

23
24

entered by the bankruptcy court on August 5, 2011, bars the

25

instant suit - plaintiff disagrees.

26

////
1

1

Defendant is to bring on a motion to dismiss within

2

thirty (30) days, plaintiff shall respond within twenty-one (21)

3

days, and defendant to reply within fifteen (15) days.

4

on the motion is set for January 14, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

DATED:

October 11, 2012.

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2

A hearing