USA v. Approximately $50,319.11 seized from 49er Credit Union Bank, held in the names of Gregory S. Baker and Darrell Hinz et al

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/20/2012 GRANTING 1 Application for Publication filed by United States of America. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 4 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN Assistant U.S. Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916)554-2700 5 Attorneys for the United States 2 3 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2:12-CV-01632-MCE-DAD APPLICATION AND ORDER FOR PUBLICATION v. APPROXIMATELY $50,319.11 SEIZED FROM 49ER CREDIT UNION BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER 1096173, HELD IN THE NAMES OF GREGORY S. BAKER AND DARRELL HINZ, DOUBLE WIDE MOBILE HOME TRAILER LOCATED AT 6170 NOB HILL DRIVE, SPACE 76, NEWCASTLE, CALIFORNIA, PLACER COUNTY, DECAL # ABE6629, SERIAL NOS. S13826XX AND S13826XXU, 2,363 SHARES OF GREATER SACRAMENTO BANCORP HELD IN THE NAME OF GREGORY S. BAKER, 2,363 SHARES OF GREATER SACRAMENTO BANCORP HELD IN THE NAME OF DARRELL HINZ, 5.0607% INTEREST IN CHINA ROAD, LLC, HELD IN THE NAME OF PACIFIC FACILITIES & DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 27 28 1 Application and Order for Publication 1 2 3 4 5 6 ANY AND ALL OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN DOUBLE CREEK RANCH, LLC, HELD IN THE NAME OF GREGORY BAKER, ANY AND ALL OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN DOUBLE CREEK RANCH, LLC, HELD IN THE NAME OF DARRELL HINZ, AND 51% INTEREST IN EARTHSAVERS EROSION CONTROL, LLC, HELD IN THE NAME OF DARRELL HINZ, 7 Defendants. 8 9 10 The United States of America applies for an order of publication as follows: 1. Rule G(4) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and 11 Asset Forfeiture Actions (hereafter "Supplemental Rules") provides that the United 12 States shall cause public notice of the action to be given in a newspaper of general 13 circulation or on the official internet government forfeiture site; 14 15 16 2. Local Rule 171, Eastern District of California, provides that the Court shall designate by order the appropriate newspaper or other vehicle for publication; 3. The defendant properties were seized or are located in the cities of: 17 Placerville, Newcastle, Sacramento, Auburn, and Woodland; and in the counties of: El 18 Dorado, Placer, Sacramento, and Yolo in California; 19 4. The United States proposes that publication be made as follows: 20 a. One publication; 21 b. Thirty (30) consecutive days; 22 c. On the official internet government forfeiture site 23 24 www.forfeiture.gov; d. The publication is to include the following: 25 (1) The Court and case number of the action; 26 (2) The date of the seizure/posting; 27 (3) The identity and/or description of the property seized/posted; 28 (4) The name and address of the attorney for the United States; 2 Application and Order for Publication 1 (5) A statement that claims of persons entitled to possession or 2 claiming an interest pursuant to Supplemental Rule G(5) must be filed with the Court 3 and served on the attorney for the United States no later than 60 days after the first 4 day of publication on the official internet government forfeiture site; and 5 (6) A statement that answers to the Complaint or a motion 6 under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("Fed. R. Civ. P.") must be filed 7 and served within 21 days after the filing of the claims and, in the absence thereof, 8 default may be entered and condemnation ordered. 9 Dated: 6/18/12 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 10 11 By: 12 /s/ Kevin C. Khasigian KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN Assistant U.S. Attorney 13 14 ORDER 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 20, 2012. 18 19 20 21 22 23 Ddad1\orders.civil\USvApprox$50,319.1632.pub.ord.wpd 24 25 26 27 28 3 Application and Order for Publication

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?