Ellis v. Reddy
Filing
27
ORDER ADOPTING 23 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/20/13 GRANTING 12 Motion to Dismiss with leave to amend. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ROBERT ELLIS,
11
Plaintiff,
Defendant.
12
13
No. CIV. 12-1691-JAM-KJN-P
ORDER
vs.
REDDY,
14
15
/
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
17
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
18
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On May 7, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
21
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed
22
objections to the findings and recommendations.
23
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
25
ORDERED that:
26
////
1
1
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed May 7, 2013 (ECF No. 23), are
adopted in full.
3
2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 12), is granted without prejudice to
4
plaintiff filing an amended complaint.1
5
DATED:
September 20, 2013
6
/s/ John A. Mendez
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1
26
Plaintiff has now filed an Amended Complaint (ECF No. 24), which shall be reviewed
by the magistrate judge.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?